
Society is now filled with toxic tribes and vile cults seeking to exploit the community. This is the result of selfish citizens banding together which naturally forms selfish groups. As a collective, these selfish groups then advocate policies which only benefit them personally or benefit whatever golden calf (false god) they have come to worship at the expense of the community at large. The result is social division. The single state, which represents the common good (civilization), simply fragments into many quarreling lots (competing tribes, rival clans) under these conditions with each side attempting to gain dominance over the other. The good citizens can only watch and hope all the competing lunatic groups in the insane asylum all somehow counterbalance each other so a semblance of reason can prevail in the end. We are living in a madhouse.
This observation may seem pessimistic when one has had time to reflect. The existence of rival tribes is not unique to our time period, as social division and tribal infighting has always existed through history, a condition almost as old as human history itself. Even the history of our Western nations is rife with competing tribes and political groups and resulting turmoil and violence from such. The moral decadence of our age, however, has made tribalism a major problem because there is little to no punishment when violating the common good, in fact, such an act may now be rewarded. Cowardice has also increased which means people today have a greater tendency to gang-up on others needlessly in large groups without shame, as such mass attacks, as opposed to individual confrontations which require greater bravery, help shield them from accountability, and this is also compounded by the simultaneous advent, and prevalence, of the internet and social media where people can shame and smear others online safely at a distance and often under the added protection of anonymity. Furthermore, mass hysteria and wickedness have devolved people to such a degree that they are willing to sacrifice others, whether by character assassination or by literal means (like wrongful imprisonment or street lynching) to feel both safe and better about themselves and to aggrandize themselves personally and this cowardly, animalistic nature is reflected in the groups that they form. This is, what we the Truthful Witness Membership, will argue is what makes modern tribes so toxic to begin with, their everlasting need to shame and slander others, to find more witches to burn at the stake so they may virtue signal their holiness.
The toxic tribes today, therefore, not only seek to persecute and enslave the innocent, they seek perpetual victims to publicly shame (character assassinate, falsely accuse, scapegoat), as the other, as the enemy, as witches, heretics, wrong-thinkers to fulfill their bloodthirst. This always results in them having to simply make-up (fish for) enemies through constant inquisition and thought policing, as the demand for evil enemies exceeds the supply. Innocent citizens must therefore be transformed (victimized) into enemies and be publicly shamed (butchered) on the tribe’s altar of lies with the tribe, most often, automatically accusing any dissenter/critic as being some crazy, stupid member of a rival tribe, despite that often being clearly false. This is why the vile ringleaders of such toxic tribes create news channels and social media channels, slanted platforms (sacrificial alters, places of humiliation ritual) designed to continually feed the toxic tribe innocent people to shame as the enemy which enables the vile ringleaders to profit and win praise, satisfaction, and power.
Above all, toxic tribes and their ringleaders seek to publicly shame, slander, character assassinate and persecute the righteous who challenge their tyranny; they wish to seek out and destroy the man who speaks truth and refuses to be enslaved, the one who refuses to worship their feelings, their false cause, their false god, by placing the community, the rights of others, first. They wish to publicly shame and slander the strong people who stand against their evil public shaming and slandering of others (the innocent). We Truthful Witnesses do not fear their slanderous tongues though. Their lies and fanciful delusions of righteousness all lack longevity and sustainability. We shall speak in defiance of such toxic tribes and will always reject their cowardly practice of stepping on others to get ahead. We know deep down these toxic tribes fear the truth and by speaking the truth, by recognizing their hypocrisy, their holier-than thou crusades, and their human sacrifice operations, we can crumble their noble facades like a house of cards.
The above examples are just some of the competing tribes existing within Western Civilization at the time of this writing (2022). There are too many to mention and new tribes and cult seeking to divide and exploit the community, while shaming and slandering the good that oppose them, are being formed daily, with the emerging tribes becoming more and more senseless and debased due to the mental decay wrought by the decline of Western Civilization.
The toxic tribes, as of 2022, all have their own charlatans and charlatan groups, from Pedophile Poachers (Child Worshippers), Black Lives Matter (Black-Brown Worshippers), to First Amendment Auditors and Sovreign Citizens (Anti-government Groups), Blue Lives Matter (Police and Military Worship), to Incels (Radical Men’s Groups), the Me-Too Movement (Radical Feminist and Women’s Groups), Anti-Wall Street Movement and Communist (Poor Worshippers), Antifa (Radical Leftwing Groups), Proud Boys (Radical Rightwing Groups), Neo-Nazis and White Nationalists (White Worshippers) etc. Regardless of their name (the names change overtime), the toxic tribes all declare outsiders guilty by default and shame-censor these outsiders by using large, cowardly gangs in reinforced echo chambers on social media while leveling blame on rival tribes for all the world’s problems based on their narrow worldview.
All these groups worship themselves and demand others worship them, OR ELSE! This despite the fact the majority of their members are blatant hypocrites (like animal rights activists smearing pigs’ blood over the homes of people they dislike or protestors complaining about racism or sexism while they rudely dismiss the arguments of people solely because these people are of another race or sex).
We reject all toxic tribes and their efforts to publicly shame and slander the good people who rightfully stand against. and speak against, their tyranny. We do not care how popular, how loved, such toxic tribes try to make themselves seem, we do not care how unprofitable it is to challenge them, we do not care how normalized they have become, Truthful Witness will stand for all the innocent people they character assassinate, and we will speak in defense of the common good and all good citizens who rightfully place their community first.
Child Worshippers demand the innocent be persecuted in the false name of children. They persecute those who do not hold reverence for their false god, and they persecute those who try to defend the rights of others from their false god. Child Worships constitute a large bulk of the contemporary populace in Western society. While they are totally obsessed with hunting down “child predators” and condemn many innocent people as “pedophiles,” all in the name of child welfare, they contrarily demand that children be allowed to trample on the rights of others, including other children. Their efforts also end up hurting children as they fail to teach children discipline and respect towards others leading to society breaking down and everyone losing.
Examples of their Tyranny:
Whenever an adult talks to a kid who is a stranger and jokes around (cant even mentor anymore) you are labeled a creep and pedo (Calling Bill Maher creep for talking to kids and young 21 year old) on Podcast. As if kids are untouchable gods.
Sex trafficking (can be flying a girl to see you
Grooming (can talk to an underage girl but if you have sex when she is now legal) it is now grooming
Child worships gather in idiot mass when social media companies rightfully ban vigilantes using their platform to expose alleged child predators (who place platform at risk and will eventually accuse innocent people) They hate when their stupid idols are challenged and punished. (might place this below in Long Descriptions)
Roblox Pedo example (banned vigilante and users, like fools, were in uproar)
Green worshippers, radical environmentalists and animal rights loons, persecute the innocent in the name of saving the planet and in the name of saving animals (their false cause, false god). While they demand everyone treat animals like people, they are happy to treat people like animals. Hypocritically, their polices are most often worse for animals and the environment. They all typically suffer from mass hysteria about the world being on the verge of some environmental, global catastrophe, which increases their fanaticism when persecuting the innocent and when halting the development and progress of civilization.
*The toxicity of environmentalist fanatics and animal rights loons perhaps supersedes the toxicity of child worshipers. This is because, while child worshippers place children above all others, the environmentalist fanatics declare all mankind, including children, as a plague upon world.*
Examples of their Tyranny:
Today, evil mobs persecute the innocent in the false name of blacks, natives, and other minorities. These toxic groups are highly prominent in Western societies, as they shame, smear, and slander innocent people, especially those who challenge their self-righteous hypocrisy which place blacks and other racial minorities on a pedestal. Members of these groups look to exploit their community by virtue signaling their moral superiority above others. While they hurl false accusations of racism, xenophobia, and bigotry on others, they tend to be the most racist, xenophobic, and bigoted of them all, as they dismiss any person who is not a member of what they deem to be an oppressed race (whites especially), and they hate Western civilization overall, despite Western society being objectively better (more civilized, more just, and more advanced) than the rest of the world for the last six hundred years. The idiocy of such mobs is revealed as even worse when one realizes that no group does more to hurt blacks, browns and other racial minorities than Black-Brown Worshippers. Any black, brown, or non-white person who has the integrity to challenge these groups and refuses to support their evil behavior is also demonized and shamed as a race traitor. This is probably a common occurrence, as those who are closest fight the most and fight the hardest.
Examples of their Tyranny:
Feminist mobs, and their variants, persecute the innocent in the false name of women, women’s safety and sexual liberation. What this entails is usually the persecution of men, people who stand for the rights of men, people who challenge feminist ideology, and anyone who defends traditional values (sex roles and the traditional family) and public modesty (like modest dress). As before, these evil mobs ironically do more to persecute women than any other group. as the women who show moral restraint and reject their beliefs and polices are ruthlessly shamed and ostracized.
Examples of their Tyranny:
Saying you should invite women on a date for a drink ” to loosen them up” must mean you are a rapist
Slogan Believe All Women *can falsely accuse men)
Crimes of “Sex Trafficking” are often nonsense (flying a girl or girls to see you and sleeping with them)
Stealthing Laws “punishing men for wanting to have sex with girls naturally and finish in them raw.
The populations of Medieval Europe, Napoleonic France, Nazi Germany, and Soviet Russia were servile, meaning they would obey any authority, even tyrannical authority, without question, but Western populations today are infantile, meaning they childishly refuse to obey any authority, even lawful (valid) authority. The childish nature of the Western citizen makes them completely unmanageable, and this has created a dangerous atmosphere for those in management, basically all people in positions of power (school staff, police, military officers, politicians, royalty, etc.), as their ranks mere existence conjures feelings of wanton animosity, scorn and resentment. Children do not like being told what to do, even if it helps others, helps the community, and gives strength to the conscience. These childish people (adult children) therefore form rebellious, anti-government groups that persecute the innocent, especially those in positions of authority, in the false name of freedom and opposing government tyranny, a convenient excuse which allows these childish people to hide their cowardly, self-serving, hypocritical nature.
People no longer have a sense of self-sacrifice, they cannot put their personal feelings aside for the benefit of society, and they refuse to grant respect to any authority, and they attack the honorable who have respect for, and who expect others to have respect for, lawful authority. The anti-government, anti-authority loons now only see authority as their servant (like children thinking they rule the household) and they demand authority appease them and their insane demands to destroy the common good, or else! This is why the best, resolute authority figures who demand respect for the common good suffer widespread persecution and are usually fired. As before, these adult children are hypocritically the biggest tyrants and are more responsible for the widespread tyranny than any other group.
Examples of Their Tyranny:
Radical men’s rights groups (today in 2022 generally referred to as the Manosphere) are the other side of the same toxic coin as radical women’s groups (radical feminists). They persecute innocent people in the false name of stopping the evils of feminism and protecting men’s rights. Their stupid, tribal videos constantly circulate social media platforms and pollute men’s video recommendation feeds with idiotic titles like: Why Men are Walking from Marriage, Why Women Have Ruined Dating, Why Society Failed Men, and titles/headlines designed to ridicule women like, Women Over 30 Can’t Find Dates LOL, Single Mother Regrets Having Child with Bad Boy, Women Want a Nice Guy Only After Being Used Up by Other Men, etc. which are all subjects designed to scapegoat women while conveniently deflecting any blame from the men. Much of this machismo comes from the men’s sexual frustration, jealousy, and insecurity of not being able to sleep with women and win sexual relationships with women while the rest comes from urge to assert control and blame the opposite sex for personal problems.
Unscrupulous pick-up artists also pollute social media and appeal to such emotions to swindle sexually frustrated men out of their money by holding useless seminars designed to teach them how to bed multiple women. Worst are these toxic male podcasts (male echo chambers) that have been recently flooding social media (as of 2023) that primarily serve as female sacrificial alters, as women, typically younger women, are invited (lured) on to speak and debate under false pretenses of open-mindedness by the unscrupulous host only so they can be deliberately disrespected, antagonized and provoked by said host then mass shamed and degraded in the comment section, after the women naturally react to the abuse, by the podcast’s idiot male followers who insult and blame women by default, and, who hate women so much, they dogmatically do not question the unscrupulous host and the host’s/podcast’s manipulated recordings, stupid reasoning, and hypocritical claims, all while they verbally attack any rational dissent in the comment section, assuming the unscrupulous host does not just automatically delete comments that do not agree with this misogynistic worldview which would be rare. This has become a common humiliation ritual. As stated, these groups hypocritically do the most to persecute men as any man who rejects their narrowminded ideas and cruel prejudices-beliefs is ruthless shamed as a fool or weakling: cuck, simp, white knight, etc.
Examples of Their Tyranny:
Say women should not vote…so if a man is a despicable person, or believes the moon is made out of cheese…and a woman is a good person…and does not believe the moon is made of of cheese, these men thing the man should be able to vote based soley because he was born with a penis. This denies merit.
Will be judged for how they judge (not sure if I put here or in bottom area)….
…Men make fun of women being infertile and less bautiful when they age bit ignores men are less strong and able as they get older. Makes fun of women in their 40s being less beautiful when not the man in his 40s that pulls out his back trying to life something heavy (something he easily could have done in his 20s)
Gay and Transgender Activist persecute the innocent in the false name of protecting gay and transgender rights. with such groups spearheading the perversion of Western society. These groups perhaps tend to be the most overtly selfish of all the evil tribes, as they attack the…
While they accuse others of being homopohbes. or transphobe, they are heterophobes
1: DUI Arrests, and marketed on Youtube. Should reject field sobreity test cause A) you’re not a circus clown doing tricks on side of the road, B) Normal people fail them all the time, multiple reasons why, C) the video will be uploaded on Youtube so you can be shamed
Incentivized by number of arrests
DUI Checkpoints harass drivers (with ineffective results)
Even if you are sleeping in your car with it off you can get a DUI
2: Every commenters was “first time this person has been held accountable or whatever
3: Drug Laws
4: Traffic Cameras
5: Say NO (when they ask you if you have been drinking or you dont answer questions without attorney present, cause you cannot trust them (even if you said you had one drink 7 hours ago they will find you guilty)
I’m not a circus clown doing tricks on side of the road (they want to shame you online)
Police back the insane policies of all other tribes (child worship, Black)
Hate speech laws
Prostitution Stings (publicly shamed for, under the false cause of stopping sex trafficing especially)
If you are charged and plead guilty to DUI…to the hysterical mob…you are an evil person who puts people’s lives in jeopardy , even if you were driving perfectly fine.
Toxic ztribalism : DUI (kill switches in cars, camera and breathalyzer in car)
Tribes use Free Speech to condemn the innocent and Hate Speech…
Toxic ztribalism : DUI (kill switches in cars, camera and breathalyzer in car)
Drug Laws (serious consequences, can’t get gun license, driver’s license suspended for 6 months , etc.
Youtube channels humilate and degrade others, with OWNED TITLES
Everyone can be shamed and turned into merchandise by a sleazy vendor attempting to profit by appealing to a immoral customer base. If the sleazy vendor appeals to left wing loons ….If the sleaze vendor appeals to right wing loons who want to point out left wing witch hunters.
False prophets body language experts
Employees can be humilated, mock, and shamed by cumstomers with camera phones .and the business does nothing
Analst who do not over-promote a public company’s stock , even though
Teachers who do not appease students and stand u pto them are fire as colleges are now businesses
Students cannot get a property education in college as , again, college are now businiess
Anyone can be humilated by a youtube , social media channgel that appeals to customer demands by crufying heretics
Controversial thinkers are banned from social media…
If an employee is mob shamed…
Anyone can be mob shamed …
DOCTORS keeping people sick
False accusations of Antisemitism (especially when Jews are attacked) (falsely accuse without evidence)
Can joke about Holocaust of say Gas the Jews in Jest (does not matter context) (remember guy in UK was charged for this)
Good discernment tells us that tribalism is not always wrong, such as in cases of talented sports teams, loving families, wonderful businesses, elite military units, and advanced nations (logical nationalism). Being loyal to a singular talented group, or virtuous group, is better than foolishly treating all groups as equal. It is also not always wrong to speak about issues regarding a particular tribe. An advocate speaking or writing exclusivity about men’s issues, women’s issues, Black America, Hispanic America, the problems police face today, gamer culture, or whatever, does not automatically create toxicity, as their reasoning can be valid, and their singular focus can shine light upon problems and solutions that were previously not considered. The problem lies when these groups selfishly view themselves at greater than the common good which means they will ultimately attempt to impose themselves at the expense of this common good. Their narrow-mindedness also will inevitably dumb everything down. For example, women’s lack of accountability, the primary fixation for radical men’s groups, and white people’s lack of accountability, the primary fixation of black worshippers, fails to subordinate itself to the greater idea, the greater truth, the overall lack of accountability of everyone in modern society.
Men’s groups can certainly talk about women getting lighter sentences than men when being convicted of a crime, but not at the expense of the greater truth which states all criminals today are getting off with lighter sentences universally across the board. The latter truth should come first and any men’s groups who disregard this, who only focus on the secondary issue of lighter sentences being rendered upon female criminals, are engaging in toxic behavior, as they are denying truth, merit, and priority. The toxicity increases should such men’s groups be so blinded by their idiot tribalism that they demand women receive the same sentences that men receive for crimes that should not be crimes, like a 22-year old having sex with a 17-year old (tyranny born from insane child-worship). In these cases, these toxic men’s groups have become so irrational, they are demanding innocent women be hurled into the volcano as human sacrifices simply because men are hurled into the volcano as human sacrifices, a fact which exposes their cowardly nature and makes them indistinguishable from the malevolent who are hurling innocent men into the volcano; they have become the same revolting swine; they are the same revolting swine.
You cannot shame and persecute one innocent group simply because another innocent group is shamed and persecuted. Under the banner of the toxic tribe, this truth is ignored, as radical men groups today have now resorted to maliciously shaming women online, for approaching and flirting with men, simply because radical women’s groups have been doing the same to men; both acts are immoral. Black advocates talking about racial inequality may have valid points, it is when they start mass shaming and falsely accusing the innocent (of racism, bigotry, police brutality, race treason) while ignoring the overall tyranny wrought by the decline of civilization, which every person, regardless of their race, suffers under, that reveals them to be toxic mutants.
Certain groups undoubtably are almost always evil, as they seek to tear down virtue and the sensible traditional values of Western civilization, such as homosexual and transgender groups, and as such groups seek to tear down free enterprise and private ownership, such as Marxists and Communists. Exceptions might exist, such as in cases where a homosexual or transgender person is lynched or receives draconian punishment. Environmentalists, often have valid points, such as protecting some endangered species, certain ecosystems, and discussing issues of deforestation, but the majority of them have devolved into climate alarmists with no sensible purpose; they only seek to halt development and tear down human civilization. And ultimately, once a tribe starts engaging in senseless crime, such as environmentalists disrupting sporting events, committing vandalism, and blocking farms and restaurants, such as black activists blocking streets and airport runways and committing riots while looting in the name of black criminals, such as political groups attacking government buildings and assaulting police in the name of absurd conspiracy theories, their toxicity, their evil is undeniable.
This is why Black Lives Matter, an evil tribe looking persecute the innocent, especially whites and police officers, in the false name of helping black people and stopping racism, was used as a convenient excuse to create Blue Lives Matter, another immoral tribe looking to persecute the innocent in the false name of police officers-law enforcement. Both slogans are idiotic, as they don’t account for exceptions (circumstances) and are used to persecute others, usually by accusing them of being a member of an opposite tribe of the opposite slogan.
In 2022, the toxic left uses the term woke to describe itself, which is a shorter way of saying awakened or enlightened while the toxic right uses the term redpill, which means the same thing, as this term is taken from the popular 1999 film the Matrix, where taking the red pill exposes one to the unpleasant truth that the world is really a computer simulation designed to keep humanity enslaved in stasis, as opposed to taking the blue pill which masks this unpleasant truth from a person so they can live in ignorance and bliss while in servitude. These nonsensical terms derive from the toxic tribes’ arrogance and are used by them to gaslight, to promote their delusions of superiority, absurd policies, and lies and enforce them upon others, so much so, that these terms today have now become jokes, used as humor to mock, dismiss, and discredit a person or group. This is not surprising as trying to boast about one’s superiority usually tends to backfire.
Black Lives Matter says only black people are oppressed and Blue Lives Matter says only police officers are oppressed. This is false. In a declining civilization, all good people are oppressed. Feminists complain about male privilege when evil men are not punished and men’s right groups complain about female privilege when evil women are not punished, when in fact, in a declining civilization, all evil people generally are not being punished and are getting away with their crimes.
The extreme political left thinks white civilization is inherently evil or inferior (for conquering land from natives and racial minorities) while the extreme political right thinks white civilization is racially superior by birth (meaning they think whites are born superior to non-whites). Both views are nonsense. White civilization has been objectively superior the last 600 years due to invention, achievement, stable government, and human freedoms (disproving the extreme left’s claims) and this is the result of geography, germs, and the established communal values of white civilization (disproving the extreme right’s claims). The toxic left lies that white civilization is inferior because the members of this toxic tribe are full of envy and resentment; the toxic right lies that white civilization is racially superior because the members of this toxic tribe and full of vanity, pride, and arrogance.
Kyle Rittenhouse Case
Daniel Penny Case
Before evidence (even after) One tribe (left) wanted to be guilty (of crime did not commit) and other trube (right) declared them heroes when the rational person would simply find them NOT GUILTY.
One side says person is hero and other guilty when reasonable it NOT GUILTY.
Make fun of leftist for not accepting 2016 election “not my President movement” but did not accept 2020)
Right/Republicans complain about politics in sports (leftist) but happy to turn every UFC event into a Republican national convention
Right (red pill) shame others on and on about identity politics, but everything is bashing women and democrats
Made fun of Democrats for not accepting election results, then they dont accept next election results and riot/insurrection then left points finger at them for Jn 6 insurrection while encouraging insurrection themselves in Minnesota (resist federal agents) (watch video if applicable)
As civilization declines more, degeneracy and hypocrisy increase which is why toxic tribes divide more and more into devolved sects. Gay rights mutated into transgender rights; the degeneracy of two men or two women marrying was replaced by an even greater degeneracy of men being called women and women being called men. The tyranny of gay marriage, which forces those to accept such degeneracy as good, was replaced by an even greater tyranny of forcing everyone to call a man a woman or a woman a man based on infantile demands (or feelings) of the individual, even though these demands (feelings) ignore biological reality.
This is why first wave feminists eventually became topless-nudity advocates and sects that demanded men accused of rape be convicted without evidence, as toxic tribes, in this case feminist tribes, devolved overtime. This is why Men’s Rights Activists devolved into Pick -Up Artist Communities, then into, Incels (involuntary celibates), pathetic groups of men who seek to persecute people, especially women and the men who have sex with women, for their (the incel’s) inability to have sexual partners; this devolved men’s group holds even crueler prejudices towards women, even going so far to cheers male spree killers when the victims are women or when the crime was committed as retaliation for being denied sex.
The devolved sect eventually becomes normalized; it first starts as a fringe cult mostly mocked and scoffed at, existing in obscure, hate-filled chatrooms, then it becomes a contending clan as more and more people tolerate its degeneracy and hypocrisy, then finally it establishes itself as the main tribe, the center, the status quo, replacing the less toxic tribe, the old order; this is the time were all citizens are forced to accept this new tribe as righteous and just or face persecution. The less toxic tribe has given way to the more toxic tribe. Traditional black civil rights activists are long gone and have been replaced with Black Lives Matter (BLM) whose toxicity far exceeds its predecessor, as the latter has devolved to the point of demanding anyone merely accused of racism or violent crimes against blacks be lynched on the street without trial. At the time of this writing (2022), one can only wonder what further devolved sect will rise from Black Lives Matter; it will not doubt be an absolute monstrosity.
ALL EVENTUALLY EAT EACH OTHER (FOR NOT BEING TRUE BELIEVERS)
All eventually eat each other. Pedophile hunters accusing other Pedophile hunters of not being true believers or just being pedophiles. like a child worshipper can ask a minor ” do you commonly talk to old men” as a way to discourage the minor from continuing to do so but the pedophule hunters will assume the question means they must be pedophiles
The increase in selfishness is causing an increase in social division (fragmentation, pettiness). This results in more and more toxic (stupid) tribes being formed for less and less sensible reasons. We no longer just have vegetarians now, we have vegans, and the two groups are in conflict with each other, further dividing what was already a stupid, narrow worldview (as humans are omnivores). The two groups both believe in not eating meat, which already separates them from the rest of normal society, but, rather than just remaining one group uniting under this sole, silly concept, as it was previously, they now break apart again and fight each other over another petty issue, the consumption of dairy products, so what was already a petty issue becomes even more petty; the senseless schism becomes another senseless schism, and this will keep going to the point where these stupid groups are now fighting over pathetic scraps.
Black activists have divided more and more, going from the more general to Black Lives Matter, to the insane religious groups harassing people on the street, like the Black Israelites. Transgender tribes declare a person’s biological sex is based on what they feel they are, but this is further dividing as certain sects of such deviants are now declaring there are 78 genders or whatever. Those who support the common good should hope the sects are too busy fighting each other but since they are now so alien to the common good, as they have distanced themselves from reason more and more with each divide, there can be no good outcomes (real virtue, real self-sacrifice) from any of these sects. They cannot even unite under the self-serving interest for the original toxic tribe that was attempting to destroy the common good.
Right hates police, left hates police, (although for different reasons they still both do)
Left hates the rich (rigth hates the right-hollywood and coporations and anti-semitism)
Both are anti-semites (leftist ..for plaestine…right…for white supremacy) but for different reasons
Have a common enemy: Jews (both left and right)
Have a common enemy: Anti-government (both left and right)
Both are anrachists (left anarchrist use racism to want to eliminate gov while right uses …
Becoming dumber and more petty (fighting over pretty things) Vegetarian vs vegans
The Roman Empire’s provinces numbered around 47 during the age of Hadrian (117-138 A.D) but over a century later had increased to 85 during the reign of Diocletian (284-305 A.D.) despite the empire’s size remaining virtually the same during these periods. This shows an increase of needless division (toxic tribalism) between the Romans and, as each new province required additional bureaucracy to govern, this increased taxation, the cost of government, financially bled Roman citizens dry.
Civilizations that start to fall have one thing in common: they become less dangerous to their enemies and more oppressive to their citizens. Toxic Tribalism is a large part of this societal oppression, as those who support the common good are now ostracized and persecuted by the unchecked tribal elements seeking to exploit the community, with the added bureaucracy and surge of unnecessary laws and high taxes, partly being a consequence of this needless division.
Contemporary governments of the West, are they similar? The United States and all Western nations are said to becoming more diverse, but as previously mentioned, this is also because people are making up nonsense to be divided about and while in the USA the states currently are not becoming more numerous, bureaucracy and government organization are certainly increasing. Federal law enforcement/defense alone includes: CIA, NSA, FBI, ATF, DEA, Homeland Security, U.S. Customs, U.S. Marshals, Veterans Affairs Police, Federal Bureau of Prisons, National Institute of Corrections, and many others. The Western citizen can only expect their governments hunger for taxes to grow in the long-term due to the added bureaucracy and rise of ineffective, unnecessary, silly prohibitive laws, like drugs laws, amongst other laws spawned from the toxic tribalism.
The endless licenses required by the state is already evidence of the increased tribalism: real estate license, teaching license, security license, law license, hunting license, alcohol license, etc. While requiring citizens to get licenses for certain things is logical to protect society, many of these licenses only apply in the region or state the person currently resides, meaning the person would have to get re-licensed (re-take classes and exams) in another state should they move, a modern feudalistic (tribal) system, which only causes job uncertainty. Furthermore, minor things like property management now requires a real estate license; the citizen needs permission from the state to do more and more mundane things which creates needless barriers to entry.
The rational observer probably has little faith in the government, but he should have total faith in contemporary government’s greed to tax citizens and pass unnecessary laws to oppress them, all partly caused by the growth of toxic tribalism.
Patriarchy is the imaginary enemy, the boogeyman, of radical feminists. For black-brown worshippers, this boogeyman is white-privilege, for white-worshippers, it is Jewish oligarchs, for poor worshippers, it is corporate elites, for (neo-conservatives? )republicans, it is the deep state. A secret cabal of enemies always plotting against them gives the toxic tribe an excuse for their shortcomings and failures, a self-soothing lie. More importantly, these boogeymen are a false justification such toxic tribes use to condemn and shame (target) their victims, to assume them guilty without evidence. A man, regardless of his circumstances, must be a beneficiary, a participant, of the patriarchy, meaning radical feminist have a convenient excuse to abuse him, to strip him of his rights, to outright discriminate against him while, of course, they whine about discrimination. A white man must be guilty for he had benefited from white privilege and a white cop must be charged and convicted of a crime, because he exists in an institution of systemic racism. Anyone who challenges the tribe, or simply can be used as a scapegoat, as a human sacrifice to be hurled into the volcano, will be declared the tribe’s imaginary enemy, the boogeyman.
Stupid tribalism has also led to the spawning of rhetoric, things like: Stop Patriarchy, End Racism, Defeat Antisemitism, etc. constantly are promoted and are insulting to the intellect. Even if there some validity to the tribal issues, these things will always exist so cries to stop them are beyond idiotic, no different than saying,” Stop Murder,” “Stop Rape,” End Terrorism,” Win the War on Drugs, Win the War on Terrorism. Murder, rape, and terrorism will always exist, eternal vigilance is required to fight criminality and evil, so calls to end these are nonsensical.
Furthermore they get jumbled into “Stop Hate” (when people should hate evil) (they dont just mean an irrational dislike, they also mean an intense dislike
The champions of such tribes (the charlatans that lead them) can use such nonsense to engage in pretense by declaring victory whatever the result. A woman’s rights advocate who gains any power or influence can claim a decrease in rape/sexual assault means she was successful in her efforts, while an increase in these crimes just means she was right all along. An increase in racial violence will be used by the cunning, race-baiting politician as a justification to voters why he/she should remain in office, so he can stop the carnage, while a decrease will be used as evidence of the success of his polices and leadership, again to appeal to voters to remain in office. The leaders of these toxic tribes tend to be nothing but pretenders.
People are usually not part of a single tribe; a person can be a black worshipper, feminist, child worshipper, gay worshipper, and environmentalist simultaneously for example, which happens to be the case for many political leftists; A person on the rightwing can be white worshipper, blue worshipper, men’s right activists, child worshipper, and a member of an anti-government group or religious cult. Many other people are in-between. Regardless, this means a person usually worship many golden calves (false gods) although it is often difficult to discern which golden calf they worship the most. Then again, what false god a person worships can change based on their whimsical feelings so, overall, whatever these people claim to worship, they worship themselves (self) and anything that appeals to the fears and fancies, at the expense of society.
It’s important to note that Child Worship seems the most universal tribe with Environmentalism being universal on the political left and elitist sentiment perhaps being more universal on the political right.
Both Left and Right are anti-government
Both Left and Right are anti-corporation
Most time you can predict what someone believes…Interchangeable
Video-gamers
Video-gamers are highly related to radical men’s groups
Antifa- Mixture of left
This is the reason all movies and shows must now have blacks, women, gays, transgender, and other minorities etc. even when the presence of such is not applicable, like movies and shows set in historical periods or in environments which tend to have one sex only. It is also responsible for smallminded drivel in films, as movies focus on total outliers like three Japanese soldiers in fighting in France in World War Two which ignores the bigger picture, the whole overall war where millions fought. Worse is movies now commonly have two men kiss despite it being disgusting to appeal to a small 2% minority, despite it ruining the movie for the remaining 98%. Videos on social media which originally contained attractive women exclusively even now are usually ruined as they now include men, or effeminate men, in the footage to appease to a bi-sexual, homosexual minority, which is tantamount to placing a turd in the punch bowl, as heterosexual male viewers, the vast majority of the audience, will find this repulsive. In fact, the very appearance of a transgender, a woman looking like a man, and, especially a man looking (and disguising himself), as a woman, causes disgust.
Tyranny of the small minority is best displayed by the acts of these transgender lunatics. Such insane groups (transgenders and their supporters) demand society and law either A) allow people to use bathrooms of the opposite sex, meaning a man who pretends to be a woman, or deludes himself into thinking he is a woman, should be allowed to use women’s restrooms and a woman who pretends to be a man, or deludes herself into thinking she is a man, should be allowed to use men’s restrooms or B) make all bathrooms unisex (sex neutral) or C) do a combination of both. This sick perversion is being imposed despite the fact that transgenders make up only a small percentage of the population, despite it ruining society for everyone else, the vast majority of people, despite it potentially exposing young children (and all people) to perverts, like a man exposing himself in a girl’s bathroom/locker-room. Furthermore, transgender lunatics are still attempting to impose tyranny on all speech, attempting to force citizens, by both social pressure and law, to use stupid gender-neutral pronouns in discussion and/or to use the incorrect pronouns based on a person’s unreasonable demands, meaning if a man calls himself a woman, you must address him as she, her, Mrs., Miss, Ma’am, meaning is a female student calls herself a boy, the teacher must address the student as such (he him, his, or even BY the male version of her name, or whatever male name she wants to give herself) and even if the specific person, or any transgender, is not present, the transgender supporters still demand you refer to the person by the pronouns of the sex they, the specific person, declare themselves as. The minority, the toxic tribe, seeks to enslave us all to their feelings.
A white teacher rightfully disciplining a young, black student offends both child worshippers, and black worshippers and these evil clans working together can significantly magnify the public shaming the teacher receives; the damaging effect will be far great than if any of these two tribes worked alone. Since people are too cowardly to speak against the evil mobs today in unison, the teacher in this case can only hope white worshippers counteract the negative effects but this still, at best, makes it two evil tribes versus one evil tribe and the one evil tribe potentially on her side also probably worships children, reducing its potential size by half. God forbid the student also be gay or transgender.
A male cop that justly shoots and kills a ferocious dog charging at him offends both animal worshippers, anti-government groups, and women worshippers subjecting him to many more times the persecution that would have been possible had he been targeted by just one evil tribe.
Cops charge you and arrest you unjustly, can feign alliance with cop hates (although they would shame and condemn a good/innocent cop just the same. If you are a man falsely accused of rape, you might be able to enlist toxic men’s groupd although they bash all women
The intellectual will find toxic tribes insufferable because such idiotic groups will always find a way to make everything about them which dumbs everything down. Black police officers wrongfully shooting a black kid will still somehow be turned into an argument about “white privilege” by the black-brown worshipping mobs. A foreign war will be turned into “gay or transgender rights” by these homosexual-transgender deviants, a woman being rightfully arrested and charged for a crime will be turning into moronic conversations about “the lack of female accountability” by toxic men’s groups.
Economic hardship and problems to solve will be turned into a conversation about black reparations.
Women raped on a vacation will quickly turn into “why werent men there” and how “men are oppressed or society needs men or whatever
Movies unrealism turns into women are so unrealistic beating multiple men
The malcious shaming of celebrities is commonplace in society because it is easier for the many have-nots to gang-up on the few haves. This is no different than rich people, the top 1% in monetary wealth, being commonly targeted (shamed, demonized, scapegoated) by the remaining 99% of the population, or toxic elements within such, only with celebrities it is even worse, since celebrities are in the spotlight, meaning they are also famous along with being usually rich (or richer), and they are often beautiful as well making them even rarer, perhaps the 1% of the 1%, so already they are vastly outnumbered by the remainder of the population.
The key driver of celebrity-hate is envy because the rich, beautiful, and famous naturally can offend everyone else including whatever tribal-partisan (nonsensical) labels people use to divide themselves from others. Celebrities can offend the non-rich which includes both the poor and middle class (most people), the ugly and average looking (which, again, constitutes most people), the unhealthy which includes those who are obese, sick, and/or injured for example, as celebrities tend to be healthier-leaner, the rural-isolated since most celebrities live in large cities with a greater social life, and the political right since most celebrities tend to be left leaning due to their urban-luxury-easier existence which has the unfortunate effect of making them lose touch with reality or they may simply appear to generally support leftwing politics so they do not get fired. It is self-evident to say that people who are incredibly lucky tend to provoke envy, and thus dislike, from those who are unlucky, or far less lucky. Being a celebrity therefore means a person automatically is at odds with multiple toxic tribes, and this is partly why celebrities get so much hate and this explains why celebrities often get little public sympathy and are publicly shamed ruthlessly even if it is unjustified. Unlike celebrities, a normal person may win sympathy, or escape shaming altogether, in the same circumstances.
The rat society, the New Inquisition, the evil shaming culture, overall, though, sees all citizens, whether famous or not, filmed more and more so they can be uploaded online as human sacrifices to be shamed by the evil masses (the toxic tribes), so they can be turned into merchandise for the villain recording, for the villain running the media/social media channel and this is especially the case for celebrities who are constantly filmed and recorded with cameras, to a far greater degree than what is common for most normal citizens.
The predators wielding cameras film people to try to catch them making mistakes to, again, maliciously upload them online and, because celebrities are constantly recorded as a result of their high status, they are particularly vulnerable to such malpractice. A celebrity can be nearly always polite and well behaved but the single moment, the single second this celebrity makes a mistake, the single second this celebrity does something silly or improper, any footage of the act is then quickly uploaded online, and the celebrity then becomes heavily criticized and shamed. As stated, a normal person might sometimes be granted more mercy in these circumstances, in circumstances where a camera catches them in a mistake, or their unknown status means, even if they are recorded committing some mistake or imaginary offense, the footage might not even be released or the footage might not even go viral even if it is released, because no one cares about them, but the high status the celebrity possesses, due largely to luck, inspires massive amounts of envy and this means going viral is a near certainty where no mercy is then granted, no leniency, no understanding that whatever mistake the celebrity made was a complete outlier, a rare occurrence, perhaps a mere 10 second outburst or single moment of weakness or single moment of drunkenness out of an entire year or decade.
The social media pages of the celebrity are constantly monitored, not just by adoring fans, but by malcontents vindictively looking to take the celebrity down a peg or two, (Constantly watching for the celebrity to slip up )so any statement, video, or post by the celebrity will be harshly scrutinized and manipulated into evidence of heresy/stupidity and, while we all make mistakes, we all commit silly acts from poor judgment, celebrities have no margin for error due to the rat culture also envying them. Furthermore, no error or mistake even needs to be committed, as, again, the evil masses simply make up offenses to flex superiority. A celebrity attending a sporting event and talking to the person they are sitting next to as they are watching the game must mean, the celebrity is an idiot who does not understand the rules of the game like an eight-year-old and needs the rules explained to him/her, an arrogant assumption which tells less about the celebrity and more about the losers doing the shaming.
Overcorrection therefore often occurs with celebrities because of the hate they face. If the celebrity is caught doing something wrong or illegal, the envy of the mob drives them to demand the most draconian of punishments with such iniquity being justified under the banner of “stopping rich privilege.” when it is the mob’s privilege that must be stopped. The idea that all are equal under the law escapes them. If the celebrity is merely accused of a crime, like sexual assault, it is to be believed at face value, even though today’s inquisition gives monetary incentive for false accusers to claim they were victimized by the rich, especially celebrities, as the high status person’s guilt or civil liability is declared without evidence, without substantiated claims; accusation and emotional appeals alone, especially against a person of high status, are now enough to win large cash settlements, and this is almost a certainty if you get fellow false accusers to join in with you in the manufactured public scandal.
Victory disease, the benefits of incredible luck and success divorce one from reality, as all men are susceptible to the delusion, entitlement, and hubris this creates; a person who is solely beautiful, solely famous, or solely rich suffers from this enough alone but celebrities, who have the combined good fortunes, almost always suffer from such a condition to an even greater degree and, as such, become more distant from the commoner, more accurately, they become more distant to the struggles of the commoner; The celebrities live in rich, fenced-off neighborhoods, in an echo chamber of sycophants, in a high life bubble. As stated, they usually become left leaning, as they start to adopt more utopian ideas, foolish ideas of inclusivity and multiculturalism, foolish ideas that deny merit in favor of the democratic, foolish ideas that can only be spawned by a life of luxury, by living in a populated city the blinds one to the harsh reality, the cruelty of nature and the strength and resolve needed to conquer it. Still, celebrity distancing is not just the result of riches and success, it is also forced upon them due to the natural envy and hatred they inspire within others less fortunate. The toxic person, the toxic tribes are always seeking a way to bring them down to ruin, which partly justifies the rich and famous distancing themselves from the rest of society.
This distancing, the vast differences in experiences between the celebrity and the commoner, the latter which tends to have a much harsher life, has helped create the popular divide in the United States of Hollywood vs the Heartland, which is a close cousin to the divides that exist between the cities (the urban) and the country (the rural) and, also in the United States, the Coastal Megalopolises (Northeastern United States and Southern California) and the flyover states, Hollywood generally representing the former in both divides and the Heartland generally representing the latter in both divides. People of both divides can have a contemptuous view of the other, with the urban considering those of the country to be smallminded morons and with the rural considering those of the city to be degenerate weaklings. Hollywood does not just exist within the urban divide, it falls deep into it since celebrity wealth can afford them to live in premium areas of the city, downtown, the epicenter, where one can have the most cosmopolitan of experiences.
Rural people who tend to be more traditional and conservative, constantly demonize and shame their more liberal, progressive, urban contemporaries (and vice versa), and they especially do this to celebrities, because celebrities epitomize the rival tribe. Celebrities are the greatest representation of the party these country folk are not invited to, and this creates seething resentment, causing them to ruthlessly shame celebrities without reason on social media and online. This is why rightwing media targets celebrities for public bashing constantly. This public bashing of celebrities, the public shaming of the rich and famous, serves as low hanging fruit. Nothing to talk about? No real news to report? Just dunk on celebrities to eat up your broadcast time. Just mock, judge and criticize them, no matter how minor the offense, to win online cheers from the idiotic rightwing audience. It must be noted that leftwing media also commonly targets celebrities, not just in rarer cases when a celebrity leans to the political right, but in all cases since envy can come from anywhere. Still, the rightwing tiresome go-to (trite default) of shaming celebrities to win praise from the envious must be highlighted as a typical example of toxic tribalism.
Can the angry mobs be forgiven? Envy, a precursor to hatred, is a powerful emotion to control and encountering someone who is perfect, or seems so, or encountering someone who simply is, or appears, just better than you (or luckier) is an incredibly intoxicating (enraging) experience and can cause one to abandon self-control and engage in abuse. Still, the public’s willingness to publicly gang-up on celebrities in large numbers without shame shows a major defect in character, as does cheering the evil, celebrity-bashing charlatans who feed the envious people with this low hanging fruit. Hating and resenting a person on a personal-individual level is one thing, public attacks, especially in large groups, is another matter, and far more extreme (cruel) behavior, a less forgivable, more severe transgression.
Celebrity shaming is sometimes warranted, however, as good discernment tells us; this is self-evident when omitting the toxic tribalism previously mentioned. Such tribalism only tends to cloud the issue, but it is clear Hollywood, and urban life today are generally spearheading Western civilization’s decline and the emergence of progressive values which foolishly discard Western tradition in favor of selfishness and degeneracy. Most new ideas come from the cities (city), with their comfort, cosmopolitanism, colleges, and commercial life, but since Western Civilization is declining, any new values and ideas that are introduced today are usually stupid, and dumber than before. Where once sensible ideas originated in the urban areas, stupid ideas now mostly come from them; one today who lives in the rural areas or modest sized cities should perhaps not be too envious those who reside in large cities for this reason.
The people influence Hollywood, like they do the media and politics, first, then, Hollywood, like media-politics, in turn, influences the people, contrary to the notions of the smallminded who view this in reverse, as the smallminded are incapable of thinking beyond the individual, the greedy politician, and the small institution. A product is made to meet the demands of the majority for profit. Movies, like media, are therefore a representation, a mirror, of the culture, the more degenerate and stupid the movies, the more degenerate and stupid the culture. (just like more evil the politician) Regardless of the public undeniable influence on Hollywood, the influence of Hollywood on the public is well-known, as it is self-evidently undeniable as well; the movie industry is a significant part of culture, no different than the media and politics. People, especially children, watch movies and mimic and normalize much of the speech and behavior they see their favorite characters displaying on film.
Degeneracy, absurdity, and narcissism are so rampant now, of course this will be largely displayed in movies. The progressive values that originate from the city are usually on full display as most Western citizens now live in cities; Hollywood is trying to meet the demands of the majority, to produce what they at least find tolerable and cities today have become overly tolerant. Furthermore, greed has motivated the movie industry to expand their global reach. Movies today are debased, not only because the decline of Western values but because they are designed to appeal to international audiences who may become offended by Judeo-Christian ethics being displayed on screen. Hollywood cannot escape all criticism as much of this criticism is valid.
The actors themselves and celebrities in general often do deserve public chastisement because many become famous and rich for engaging in degeneracy. People today are willing to do anything for a paycheck, for a dependable salary; they will sacrifice personal dignity, all integrity, all notions of civic duty to the community.
to star in a new movie role or to release an album.
Why does Hollywood spearhead decline and progressive values?
How Celebrity shaming/critics can be logical
Rich and famous condecend to others. Look down..
How can you not be righteously angry with a black actor playing George Washington or Winston Churchill (not in jest), how can you not get mad at horror movie actors being insultingly stupid, morally bereft, and cowardly, how can you not be mad with a male actor who allows himself to get beat up on screen by a woman half his size (assuming the woman is not playing character that is superhuman or supernatural or cybernetic), how can you not be mad with old actors ruining beloved franchises by returning for meaningless, poorly written cash grab sequels decades later, how can you not be mad at an actor insulting audiences intelligence by playing some trite cliche that does not apply to the actually story (like “the protagonist who just wants to be left alone” trope but existing in a post-apocalyptic setting where there are barely any humans left, where anyone would yearn for socializing with others, especially attractive members of the opposite sex, which makes the trope (the character-protagonist who just wants to be left alone) appear forced. artificial, and stupid.
How can you not be mad at the musician releasing degenerative garbage as music…
How can you not be mad when they star in gross commercials that disgust you while you are watching TV and eating?
Some criticism is valid, celebrities who got famous for degeneracy.
Celebrties can have cult followings to arent always good. People cannot escape the sirens call (sirens of the age)
The fact that the actor “gets paid” only goes so far to elicit sympathy from the Truthful Witness, as, with most industries today, getting paid clearly requires more and more of an abandonment of honor. Therefore, the actors that become famous today are largely the worst people, those willing to metaphorically (and probably literally) “blow” their way to the top in order to achieve movie fame, riches, and success, no different than politicians, businesses, and social media commentors more and more debasing themselves for votes-profit-likes now to the point of glazing (sucking off) their supporters-customers-followers. This will get worsen overtime as the West declines, so actors and actresses, now on the screen, and even more so in the immediate future, are, and will be, nothing but repulsive swine deserving of shame generally. No good person could debase themselves to such a degree for any price, even to star in film.
The tribe’s hate and, sometimes even fanaticism, is driven by envy. This can explain why when celebrities are maliciously recorded then uploaded only to be ruthlessly shamed online there could be far less objection, far less protest than when this happens to the commoner. Indeed, society now treats the constant shaming of celebrities with total normality; it does not even blink at the concept. Critics or dissents may point out that this is the price one pays to be a celebrity, that it simply goes with the territory of being rich and famous and while this is true in a factual sense, malicious shaming and cyberbully is wrong regardless of who the person is, the unbiased mind sees this truth; if a person is maliciously recorded then uploaded online to be unfairly shamed, they were wronged regardless of their status, whether they rich or poor, whether they be famous or unknown.
Celebrities naturally become more isolate, hence out of touch, due to being filmed in public.
Purpose of this paragraphy (offending most tribes is dangerous.
It is why when they are maliciously recorded to be shamed online there could be far less protest than when this happens to a normal person. Especially it seems to be the case in more conservative echo chambers which stand against the more liberal Hollywood and try to divide society by Hollywood vs the Heartland, the latter which they support over the former. But is also can be in liberal echo chambers as well , always fishing for evidence of racism, sexism, homophobia, or wrongthink.
Little to no complaints when celebrities are maliciously filmed and uploaded online. (assumed to go with territory for wealth and fame)
Celebrities tend to be more left, and delusional, as one with inheritance and success becomes, also watched more
Famous people are filmed constantly so more vulnerable to rat society. Think Dana White when he slapped his wife back.
Any charlatan or demagogue can weaponize these tribes by declaring others guilty of wrongthink (modern heresy). An evil man may not be a child worshipper himself, but he can destroy the good who stand against him by falsely accusing and slandering them of being child abusers, sex predators, pedophiles, or pedophile sympathizers for not supporting his immoral polices; this marshals the wrath of child worshippers against his targets. Again, the evil man might not be a black worshipper or white worshipper himself, but he can level accusations of racism or reverse racism (racism), upon the innocent to destroy them, their names, their reputations, and to win these toxic tribes over to his side. For the unscrupulous politician or cult leader, they can just use whatever tribe (tribal mentality) is convenient in the moment to slander the innocent to win power. They can effectively marshal any tribe, weaponizing self-righteousness and mass hysteria.
Actually cheered that rich people were scammed despite:
Anti-rich tribes hate rich people so much, they are self-destructive
Hate rich people so much, they cheer when it hurt everyone.
Black worshippers who complain about police wrongfully arresting black people ignore the other victims wrongfully arrested by police such was whites, Asians, other police, etc.
In 2021, the Anti-Wall Street Movement (Poor Worshippers) complained that the buying restrictions placed on certain stocks during the GameStop Short Squeeze (Reddit Stock Mania) hurt the ordinary investors while only benefiting the rich when, in fact, it hurt all investors who held equity positions, whether poor or rich (the affected stocks could only be sold, not bought, so therefore fell in value). In other words, the Anti-Wall Street Movement, so blinded by anti-rich sentiment, ignored that rich people who held equity positions also suffered monetary loss from the resulting stock plunge.
The GameStop Short Squeeze was fueled not only by greed, speculation, and the fear of missing out, but by the Anti-Wall Street Movement and the Reddit Mob (a fanatical core); GameStop and a number of other stocks (like movie theater stocks) were heavily shorted by certain hedge funds (meaning these funds were betting on the stock’s falling further in price), the objective of the poor worshippers was to promote these stocks and get people to buy them in mass which would cause the stock prices to rise, forcing the hedge funds who shorted these stocks into a squeeze where they would have to cover their losses by re-purchasing shares are higher prices (further elevating the stock more and more) causing the hedge funds to ultimately lose money of many tens of millions of dollars while the ordinary investors who bought shares profited from the price surge . The mission was to “stick it to Wall Street and to help the little guy” with said price surge.
This stupid, tribalistic plan failed because A) hedge funds-rich people who held shares (equity positions) in these stocks also benefited from the stocks rising in price and got richer. Hedge Funds that short stocks, in fact, only make a small percentage of the market. A greater number of hedge funds (rich people) therefore benefited from these stocks rising in price. This means the Anti-Wall Street Movement helped rich people get richer by conducting the short squeeze. 2) The ordinary investor who shorted these stocks also got financially burned (meaning they lost money when the stock prices rose). These ordinary investors were the human sacrifice needed for the Anti-Wall Street Movement and Reddit Mob to engage its holier-than-thou crusade against Wall Street. The fact that they wiped out ordinary short sellers means they callously hurt the very people they claim to support. 3) They encouraged ordinary investors to buy and hold equity (shares) in these trouble stocks (dying businesses) at absurd prices far above their intrinsic value which ultimately caused ordinary investors, the very people poor worships claim to support, to, again, lose money when the stocks eventually dropped back down to reality. Therefore, by trying to stick it to the rich and help the poor, the poor worshippers ended up helping the rich and sticking it to the poor, creating more poor people. This is the idiocy of such tribalism.
Worse, this shows many within the Anti-Wall Street Movement do not care about helping poor people, they just use helping the poor (or the little guy) as an excuse to engage in evil behavior, manipulating the market while hypocritically complaining about rich people manipulating the market.
It should be no surprise such an idiot tribe publicly shamed any dissenters on social media like some deranged cult for challenging these poor worshiper’s blatant hypocrisy and excess. They mocked and dismissed any dissident (including poor people) as “being an angry investor who lost money in a hedge fund” which, although designed to be an insult, is really not, as they are accusing the person of being rich by having money in hedge fund in the first place and it does not make sense either, as A) most people are not rich so the chances of a random commenter online being rich enough to have enough free capital to put into a hedge fund (minimum is usually $250,000 in 2022) is low and B) hedge funds-rich people mostly benefited from the poor worshippers’ actions anyway, something the poor worshippers are apparently too stupid to realize.
White worshippers will often rightfully complain that, when white people say an accurate stereotype about a non-white people, they are publicly shamed and persecuted (as racists), but then they will then publicly shame and persecute black people who say accurate stereotypes about whites in retaliation. This just repeats the vicious cycle. Resulting in more people, including whites, being wrongfully shamed and persecuted.
Men’s right groups often complain about female sex offenders are given shorter prison sentences than male sex offenders. This has some validity but then such men’s groups destroy their credibility when also doing this for cases where the minor (the declared victim) was as old as 17 which generally should not be a crime in the first place. The men’s rights groups, so deluded by tribalism, demand the wrongful punishment of women in these cases simply because men are wrongfully punished more severely, but both punishments are wrong, regardless of sex and the punishment’s duration. Worse, this perpetuates wrongful punishment resulting in more people, including men, being wrongly charged and convicted. Rather than abolish oppressive law, they demand women be equally punished under such oppressive law; even if this occurs, all the results is more people being wrongfully punished will the oppressive law still remains. Therefore, by their tribal stupidity, men’s right activists hurt not only innocent women but innocent men, the very people they claim to support.
The Stolen Valor Affair, one that perhaps reach its peak in the mid-2010s and was broadcasted all over social media, to the point where is became a parody, serves as another example, as the military worshippers-blue worshippers, quickly turned it into a witch-hunt where innocent people were falsely accused and then publicly humiliated-shamed on social media of/for stealing valor, even by simply wearing a jacket with army camouflage. More on Stolen Valor is mentioned here: Evil Predators with Cameras.
DEMANDING HUMAN SACRIFICE
OJ SIMPSON TRIAL (HAD TO IGNORE VICTIMS LETTING A BLACK MAN GET AWAY WITH ONE
SAME WITH RIOTERS AND DEMANDING COPS BE LYNCHED
MeToo (makes real cases less believed)
HAVE TO BEWARE ZEALOTRY (Might be a rise of antisemitism but that means there will be a lot of false accusations of such too as a counter
Or in many cases, they’ll just dismiss the strongest argument as hate (from haters), or strawman the strongest argument to that of the weakest, meaning they will lie and try to make the strongest argument look the exact same as the weakest. There is a reason Toxic Male Podcasts, which are design to appeal to needless male tribalism, men’s pride and demand for many sex partners, only invite young women, strippers, porn stars, and digital prostitutes on their shows, as any intelligent person would quickly tear massive holes in their narrow worldview. It’s much better for the men’s toxic tribe to debate against naive, clueless women, or more ideally, heartless bimbos who shamelessly seek to milk men for their money, to promote the toxic tribe, and the toxic male host, as some savior against men’s oppression, as some answer to men’s problems. This is the lowest hanging fruit. How can he, the toxic male podcast host, not be seen as a savior, or at the very least, as intellectually superior, when debating against such obvious inexperience, foolishness and immorality?
Rightwing channels on social media will do the same thing, as they commonly visit college campuses to conduct interviews with young, inexperienced, and often deluded, (generally left leaning) college students in a crass effort to reinforce their already existing beliefs. No effort is made to interview anyone of intelligence, or more sinisterly, any intelligent person who was interviewed will be conveniently edited out of the video, leaving only the interviews of stupid people trying to give answers, stupid people who cannot even answer NO to the simple question, “Can men get pregnant?” Interviewing (dunking on) fools while ignoring the intelligent allows the rightwing channel (or any toxic channel) to avoid any notable challenge and maintain a fake aura of invincibility.
Claims “why cant we just ask questions” “jews and Israel or whatever are not above criticism” when it is the criticism they give that is a problem.
Why cant we question “insert tribe”
Its not that they are asking questions it is they are not attempting to get to answers…the answers they give are stupid…..”Is the Moon made out of cheese” Maybe” and any valid criticism attacks the stupid answer, not the question..
It there stupid conclusions that are criticized, not them asking questions like they claim (under 1 million died in Holocaust or whatever cause…I heard)
Its that that you are asking questions which you are being ridiculed and shamed, its your stupid conclusions
Claiming Jews are the New Nazis…
Examples:
Think Manhood Academy
Radical Feminist
Rightwing
Leftwing
Black
Frauditors
This dishonest practice, the constantly lies to avert justice, is source of frustration for critics-opponents with any trace of intelligence. To their exasperation, they will watch a toxic commentator or influencer address the least substantive comments that offer any criticism while the most substantive comments of valid criticism are glossed over, ignored, or outright deleted. The toxic commentator/influencer will commonly do this with satisfaction and glee, showing their pride in mentally torturing the public.
Tribes will say one reasonable thing and then bundle it together with an unreasonable thing and when you argue against it they claim you are arguing against it they falsely claim you are arguing with the reasonable thing (like men being falsely accused of sexual assault or being disadvantaged in the courts with divorce and children) (or transgender ideology)
The Toxic men’s guru highlights the 100 male customers who claimed his fake (fraudulent) course (to get rich and bed many women) helped them but not the 1000 male customers who stated the exact opposite; the 10,000 men who cheer him on are pronounced, not the other 100,000 men who criticize and condemn him. Righteousness, justification is foolishly sought in the ad populum (everyone agrees with me so I must be right) but this is added or wrapped in, with an additional fallacy, the fallacy of selective evidence (confirmation bias). This act is usually deliberate though, as it is a way for the guru, the fraud to avoid accountability. Real estate seminars, fraudulent schemes which tempt people to become rich quickly, operate no differently, as they highlight the 10 people who became rich in their course while conveniently omitting the hundreds or thousands of people, they successfully swindled out of their savings by encouraging them to engage in a enterprise with no real competitive advantage. (and assumes market will always be up)
The first fallacy, (ad populum) being commonly used makes this more remarkable since these toxic tribes consider themselves superior to others and they, therefore, tend to condemn their opponents (rival tribes and all outsiders-non-believers-heretics) as mindless sheep. For example, the toxic men’s groups will claim women are less intelligent than men, that women mindlessly follow mass consensus and popular opinion, that women brainlessly go along with whatever society as a whole is doing, but then these same men’s groups will use ad populum (everyone agrees with me/us) defensively to justify their views (misogyny) and offensively to degrade and discredit critics. The irony that they are the mindless sheep, that they are relying solely on mass consensus and popular opinion, to justify their views escapes them. At some point, nearly every toxic tribe displays such breathtaking hypocrisy.
For toxic tribes engaging in witch hunts, it is all the same. The pedophile hunters (child worshippers) will highlight the sickest child predators (like a man attempting to have sex with an 8-year-old) but they will conveniently ignore the numerous people they falsely accused ,as child predators, like the 21-year-old trying to have sex with a 16 year old, and even if 9 out of the10 people they caught were the most egregious of child predators, the 1 out of 10 people who were innocent hold the greater gravity, and expose those doing the pedophile hunting as malevolent creatures and/or deranged lunatics. The radical feminists, the advocates of the Me-Too Movement, will again highlight all the real rapists they have gotten convicted, all the blatant sexists they have had exposed and fired from their jobs, but never mentioned are the innocent men they got convicted or fired, never mentioned are the innocent men they victimized under the false banner of righteousness, never mentioned are the innocent men who were callously caught in the crossfire of the toxic women’s crusade, who, to this toxic women’s group, to the unholy crusade, were collateral damage.
The statement “facts do not care about your feelings” is commonly used dishonestly, and condescendingly, by toxic tribes seeking to degrade and provoke their critics and to demonize-dismiss them as crazy, falsely accusing the critic (their target) of ignoring simple, plain truth when it was the toxic tribes’ blatant misuse of facts that brought righteous criticism. The common strategy for any evil charlatan looking to avoid accountability is to falsely accuse his opposition of being crazy and/or stupid by claiming they do not believe facts, when intelligence is not merely stating facts, it is using them to a sensible end. Knowing there is a 90% chance of heavy showers tomorrow, a fact, alone is useless, one has to use this sensibly, such as them dressing accordingly, perhaps them planning to wear rain boots and a raincoat, perhaps them bringing an umbrella, or perhaps planning to leave early for work since rain reduces visibility, reduces traction, and, therefore, slows traffic down. The person, again, uses the fact to a sensible end, but this is beyond the tribe’s mental abilities so they will just accuse all opposition of not believing in facts so they can sound smart and superior.
Radical feminists, or any toxic women’s group, will state the fact, “Virtually all Serial Killers and Mass Shooters are Men,” and then will attempt to maliciously use this fact as a justification to advocate stripping men of their rights and when challenged, they will then falsely accuse all critics of not believing the simple above fact, even if those challenging them also have conflicting facts, like “Virtually all those who Stop Serial Killers and Mass Shooters are Men.” Rather than address their foolish misuse of facts, which could uncomfortably reveal their views are spawned from their hatred of men, these misandrists will just reside in their echo chamber and condemn all those who stand against them as fact-ignoring idiots, when the truth is they ignore facts which conflict with their insane worldview, they are, in fact, the fact-ignoring idiots; they only selectively see the facts that give their toxic tribalism validation.
The Market Crash of 2008, also known as the Great Recession, was used (manipulated) by both the Democrats and the Republicans for their selfish ends. The Democrats smeared the Republicans by claiming the crash started at the end of Republican President’s term, implying that the Republicans were solely responsible for causing it. The Democrats then praised themselves by highlighting the severity of the crash and that the long economic recovery from the severe crash occurred under the Democratic President’s two terms, implying they, the Democrats, were solely responsible for fixing it. In turn, the Republicans smeared the Democrats by claiming the economic recovery was long (very slow), that, in fact, it was one of the slowest economic recoveries in American history, implying the Democrats failed to fix the economy and that Republicans could have done a much better (faster) job restoring it. This is all nonsense; in reality, the market crash and market recovery had little to do with who is in office and the market always has up and down cycles. This is an example of both tribes selfishly manipulating facts to achieve power, while callously insulting the intelligence of the truthful witness in the process.
Will say “Democrat ruined the military” ignoring they said this under last Democrats (expect people to have short memory_
If market is doing good (unemployment low) under republicans, democrats will just say “it could be better” or just say ” it is still bad amd vice versa.
The truth is, it does not matter what happens, it does not matter what occurs, it does not matter how things are going, both toxic tribes will attack each other and manipulate facts and cherry-pick facts, to promote their superiority. Republicans will hyperbole and say “everything is worse under the Democrats, and Democrats will hyperbole say ” everything is worse under the Republicans” with both sides presenting selective evidence to justify their idiotic claims. Audaciously, they expect the truthful witnesses to entertain and validate this stupidity; they expect us to degrade to the partisan (tribal) mind.
Different between saying 2+2 = 4 and “Hey dummy, 2+2=4 (cause the latter assumes you to be an idiot who doesnt know 2+2=4, but objecting to just mistreatment sees the tribe of falsely accusing of not accepting the fact that 2+2=4
Toxic tribes falsely accuse any dissenter of being the other. Charlie kirk (Steven Crowder too) and supporters go around with a camera to shame (perhaps rightfully so) leftist protestors and leftist at gatherings but anyone who dissents is also placed in that crazy leftist lot
Complain about NFL becoming WOKE/Leftist, you are a stupid rightwinger
Complain about UFC become a republican national convention (2022), you are a leftist, woke snowflake.
Easy to see pic picture. Call themselves Alpha Podcast cause they believe in rule of Jungle… Simply want to satisfy their own lusts.
Israel is small and surrounded by Muslim states whuch are large and far more populated but they still want Israel to give up more
Want their politician to win cause it benefits them…Want racism or sexism called out cause it gives them power to control others. They force others to walk on egg shells.
White can criticize people of color is an attempt to win privilege
Virtue Signalling and MeToo is an attempt to win female prvilege (privilege to accuse and be believed without evidence)
Additionals put somewhere)
Toix men groups contantly mock women for losing beauty and fertility as they age, but wouldnt want women to make fun of men for losing strength, and having erection problems as they age..
Toxic tribes arguing “You thought the other one was justified…now you’re saying this one isnt…
Micropes vs insects wording
Scalability and Counterbalance
A toxic tribe’s scalability (destructive potential) depends largely on how many people it includes within itself (its clan) and how many people it condemns as outsiders (heretics and/or inferiors). It is self-evident to state that tribes who alienate or scapegoat large sections of the population have to form cliques or cults where their overall effect is minimal. An evil family, group of friends, or workplace is the smallest form and the most obvious example. The rest of the world is an unwanted outsider to this stupid, self-important in-crowd. The vast majority of toxic tribes exist in this microscopic form, as microbes always far outnumber bigger lifeforms. Selfish people today are more loyal to whatever group they fancy being a part of at the expense of the community at large which creates millions of small toxic tribes undetectable in the grand scale. A small gang of hooligans blasting music from the vehicles disturbing everyone, a pornographic actress and her army of loyal, perverted followers who are all willing to defend her honor against those who rightfully criticize the actress for her lewd acts and immoral behavior, or an evil family coming to the defense of one of its members who just committed armed robbery all qualify as microscopic toxic tribes. These microbes victimize people on a local scale but need the backing of larger tribes to do greater damage.
The religious cult, who views all outsiders as satanic, perhaps would be an example of a low ceiling, but one often higher than the family, social circle. or workplace (or most workplaces). In this case, this might be comparing size of an insect to a microbe; the insect still being tiny but far greater in size than the microbe. Because they condemn over 99% of their host nation’s population as heathens (probably because most people understandably will not bow to the unreasonable demands of the group’s narcissistic leadership), their membership tends to be limited making their power negligible; it is for this reason they become cults in the first place. Unless their tribe were to adopt beliefs to include a broader segment of Christians, and preclude the condemnation of most citizens, their group should remain small and weak. Whether we talk about the insect (the hive tribe) or the microbe (the microscopic tribe) this truth should shine light on the lack of intelligence of most narcissistic family heads and cult leaders, who treat their tribe as a god upon Earth; in truth they lack the intelligence to understand simple scalability. The are insignificant specks.
Hitler and the Nazi Party’s political success can be attributed to the fact (the luck) that Jews, and Communists made up only a small percent of Germany’s population, added to the fact that antisemitism was rife in the period. The Nazis avoided resistance because they didn’t have to condemn the bulk of the population, in fact they lowered resistance as the masses could scapegoat (blame) the Jewish/Communist minorities for Germany’s troubles while the hated Slavs (deemed inferior by the Nazis) existed beyond Germany’s borders could be villainized as an external enemy. Communism itself gained power in Russia, China, North Korea, and other smaller states because it scapegoats mainly the rich, who only make 1% of the population; appealing to the envy of the 99% is usually an effective strategy that grants high potential for the evil person. The political right also does this when it condemns Hollywood and corporations.
A men’s supremacist (misogynist) seems to condemn 50% of the population: women, as stupid and/or inferior, creature whose only design is to fulfill male sexual needs but in reality, he is probably condemning a greater percentage as the moderate men who don’t adhere to his misogynistic views will also be condemned as cucks or weaklings. Although his cult is poisonous, his rise and effect (same with his counterpart, the woman supremacist: misandrist) will hopefully be more limited due to counterbalance, although it must be stated that Islamic third world nations are ruled by unchecked machismo. Potential is also weakened with the white supremacist, at least today in 2021. In the past, when non-whites (blacks, Hispanics, etc.,.) made up a smaller percentage of the population, a more powerful following could likely be achieved but now with non-whites constituting a much larger percentage of Western populations, the potential power of the White supremacist group is hopefully more limited. Unfortunately, and conversely, black-brown supremacists have no doubt gained destructive potential due to this fact, although Whites still exist is significant numbers to potentially counterbalance.
PROBLEM; ISLAMIC STATE MACHISMO IS DIFFERENT THAN WESTERN…..WESTERN IS BUILT ON LACK OF IMPLUSE AND DESIRE FOR SEX WHILE ISLAMIC IS RESTRICTIVE TOWARDS SEX
Numbers can be deceptive, however. At the time of this writing, African Americans (blacks) make up only about 13% of the U.S. population, yet the toxic tribalism existing within this group seems to have the ability to impose itself upon government policy and public opinion with far greater strength than would appear capable based on that smaller number. The common occurrence of Caucasians (whites) being falsely accused of racism then publicly shamed in the media and online, as well as police officers suffering the same fate while also being wrongfully fired, charged, and convicted of crimes when using appropriate violence against evil, black criminals, both attest to this fact. Yet when one realizes that another 18% of the U.S. population is Hispanic, of which many of its toxic elements also seek to persecute innocent white people under the same false banner of “stopping racism” and that there is also a large number of non-black, non-Hispanic people (whites mostly) who are willing to shamefully side with blacks when they try to impose tyranny, usually for the purposes of virtue signaling. The 13% number therefore only represents a smaller core, with a larger surrounding mass of unscrupulous supporters (orbiting bodies) who are willing to back their false causes and idiot slogans.
Homosexuals comprise an even smaller minority than blacks, constituting only perhaps 3 to 5% of the overall U.S. population, yet the gay community (the LGBT community) and gay rights activists were able to successfully pressure lawmakers to legalize gay marriage in 2015 and to enact laws making it illegal to discriminate based on someone’s sexual orientation. Furthermore, anyone who stood against such degenerative policy and who stood against homosexual activity being normalized was ruthlessly shamed by vicious mobs. Again, here we a small core, in this case homosexuals, enabled by a larger mass, heterosexuals, willing to stand up for what they falsely deem to be an oppressed minority.
Christians were a small minority …but were able to impose..on roman paganism
Small vocal minority…out weights…10000 silent people…the moral people are refusing to fight…
Which political tribe is worse, conservatives or progressives? Overall, these labels are questionable, especially for the latter; are these groups truly conserving or progressing anything? Progressivism seems to imply all change, whatever direction societal values are heading, can be deemed “progress” which is an absurdity. Furthermore, are these opposing political ideologies, these tribes, really that different? If a man who lived 200 years ago or if a man 500 years into the future were to jump into a time machine and see these rival tribes as they are today, would he see any distinction? Does a present-day foreigner even see any distinction? Probably not. Nonetheless, however suspect and narrow such terms are, we shall use them as they are for the sake of simplicity.
Logically, an intelligent man who understands civilizational decline and the fact that Western civilization currently is in a state of decline, may be tempted view conservatives more favorably because they are at least attempting to hold on to (conserve) the remaining sensible traditions of the past which helped the West prosper while progressives are spearheading new (insane) ideas that abandon sensible tradition (like eliminating sex from birth certificates: 2022) which is clearly dragging Western society down into total ruin. To even claim today’s Western society is somehow achieving progress in the long-term is idiotic; it is like the progressive are so foolish, so mentally disposable, such expendable sheep of their age, they are not even aware of their civilization’s impending collapse. This initial thought does not change common sense, that the acts of conserving (maintaining tradition) and progressing (discarding or changing tradition) depend on the circumstances whether they are sensible, or not. Being a conservative, conserving the traditions of the past, is sometimes right or wrong and being a progressive, discarding/altering traditions of the past in favor of new ideas and new policies, is sometimes right or wrong. Therefore, it is idiotic to declare one should always act as a conservative or one should always act as a progressive, i.e. that one is always right, hence people who always declares themselves to be in either camp, conservative or progressive, are usually tribal fools.
Clearly most new ideas, like most attempts at innovation, fail and are stupid so common sense demands a man be more conservative than progressive; why not stick to what works? Why not trust and follow the traditions, the practices of our ancestors, the traditions-practices which took generations and hard-work to build, traditions, many of which, were learned by pain and bloodshed. A stupid man does not learn from his mistakes, a smart man learns from his mistakes, a wise man learns from the mistakes of others, so why not learn, and adopt, the sensible traditional practices of our forebearers? After all, one of the advantages, humans have is the ability learn from, and build knowledge upon, pass generations. A man, a truthful witness, superficially should probably be more conservative than progressive. Discarding tradition, the tradition which enabled the West Nations to triumph over others and prosper is never a good thing, it’s insane, and this is what today’s progressives represent. Progressives today are generally all morons.
Conservatism does not escape criticism, however, because, what if there is little, or nothing, left to conserve? What if the values you are trying to conserve are no longer adequate? What if we are at the tail end of our civilizational lifespan where there are almost no vestiges of sensible tradition remaining? As society descends, conservatives are clearly conserving (holding on to) less and less, making their “conservation” less and less sensible. Suppose a society was to fall so far, abandoning all moral restraint and decency, and legally allow, even normalize, fornicating in public. Despite the fervor of an occasional revolution, changes tend to only be accepted gradually by the populace in the long-term, which means this debased society’s popular conservative base will be advocating for completely weak policies to reverse the obscene trend, like they will demand and advocate that public fornication not to be allowed near schools or in public parks where there are children present, which is a single step back in the right direction in an effort to conserve what remains of decency when 50 steps back are required for any decency to exist at all.
Public fornication should be totally illegal, heavily shamed, with blatant perpetrators receiving harsh stigma and being immediately arrested then resolutely punished by law (made criminals), but conserves could not advocate for this long path back up, as it would be too drastic for a society already so far gone; it will prove indigestible. They can only conserve the remaining scraps, and as such, and as stated above regarding the lack of distinction between the two tribes, are almost indistinguishable to their more progressive contemporaries who believe fornicating in public is acceptable, at least to the decent, the truthful witnesses, who still remain, or are willing to go, 50 steps back into the realm of actual decency. The witnesses know that, in this case, Conservatism (conserving) will not suffice, a Restoration (restoring) is needed to improve society.
For this reason, while progressives today totally insult the human intellect (and offend human decency), conservatives today tend to be intellectually unsatisfying, as if they are trying to bring back the clock to slightly more reasonable time period, but never going the full mile needed, they never take the final steps to reach the full conclusion, delivering only light swings, not the deathblow of reality. They only possess a small spot of truth which we can see in a glass still largely filled with lies; it is heavily diluted. The truth is softened to be more digestible to the dishonest time period, rather than the truth being pure, a violent shockwave which obliterates all lies before it.
They will kinda (willy nilly) side with a police officer when arresting a disorderly (unruly) person even though the police officer was 100% in the right and the person deserved to be arrested tased or shot.
They will say Israel (or any country) has a right to defend itself but will shy away uncomfortably when mass boming and offensive operations are needed. (same with USA Border)
So, for example, (edited for 2023) while progressive mobs denounce the nation of Israel for bombing and laying siege to Gaza when fighting a war against Hamas, with these progressive mobs falsely accusing Israel of war crimes and genocide, of starting the conflict in the first place, the conservatives, only softly respond with the argument “Israel has a right to defend itself” while perhaps pointing out that fact that Hamas, in reality, seeks to commit genocide by killing all Jews while simultaneously debunking the idiotic claims of the progressives, mainly by pointing out that Israel has not committed genocide, as the population of Gaza, and all the Palestinians, have grown exponentially over the years, despite Israeli forces theoretically having the power to prevent this.
Shown by the diabolical, murderous, acts of Hamas on Oct 7th when it invaded Israeli territory.
If she opposes genocide against native peoples, then she should SUPPORT Israel since the Jews are the indigenous people.
Progressives cheer Muslim states …despite being anti-women , anti-gay
The conservative response is unsatisfying to the truthful witness, for it is a mere step in the right direction, but it never goes to its ultimate conclusion: that genocide is sometimes right, and that, because the Palestinians seek to commit genocide upon them, Israel should, in fact, probably commit genocide to remove the Palestinian threat. At the very least, the Palestinian population has to be forcibly removed from all Israeli territory, which will probably involve genocide (mass death) to some degree. Furthermore, Israel has more than simply “a right to defend itself,” in order to remove the threats to its existence, it has a right, if necessary, to conquer many of its hostile Muslim neighbors that are always plotting it demise, including the imprisoned state of Gaza. This noble crusade could establish a Greater Israel and prevent Israel’s hostile neighbors from developing nuclear weapons. Yet military conquest and military resolve is too offensive to the current cowardly generation, leaving conservatives to only speak minimally on topics of Israeli (Judeo-Christian) survival.
Death penalty is not wrong to use on those who kill, not more than genocide is not wrong to be use on those who commit malicious genocide
The fact is that if all Palestinians and Muslims in the states surrounding Israel laid down their arms, they would continue to exist, as they would be tolerated by the Jews, but if the Jews all laid down their arms, they would all be swiftly annihilated, and the Jewish state erased, and this ultimate truth, one commonly touted, largely by today’s conservative (non-antisemitic) element, when coming to Israel’s defense against antisemitic progressives, in fact, grants Israel the justification to use genocide in retaliation. If an enemy people are willing to inflict genocide upon a nation, that nation should be willing to inflict the same upon the enemy people. This is not atrocity, this is not a war crime, it is righteous resolve and to abandon such is cowardice. The Jews have long since passed the point of tolerance, as their attempts as such are constantly violated; the Islamic hordes, like any predator, view such tolerance, such kindness, as weakness. No popular conservative, holding on to vestiges of military spirit (one which saw the righteous nuclear bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the righteous forced removal of Germans from Eastern Europe in 1945), can now speak this truth, however, truth that the progressives hate and despise as they know genocide, or its threat, against the Islamic barbarian is the right path, hence they constantly accuse Israel doing it (falsely), in an effort to make them feel guilty for what would ultimately be the right conclusion.
The Mexico-United States border serves as another example. The progressive movement in the USA largely want what they call “an open border” where migrants coming from Mexico into the United States, even if they enter the country illegally, are all welcomed and permitted residence. The term open border, of course, is an oxymoron, as this means there is, in fact, no border, if almost any alien can enter. At best though, the conservatives counter this by stating that there needs to be strong defense at the border, perhaps even a wall, which is a touch of sanity, but the fact that the American military should conduct offensive operations and even invade and conquer Mexico (launching another Mexican-American War) to create a shorter (stronger/more defensible) border, as Mexico narrows as one travels south, will be too drastic of a solution, as these conservatives are almost as soft as the progressive they claim to oppose. Again, is there any real distinction?
Marriage is another example? Abolishing gay marriage isnt enough and this simply pullback (less than a decade in the USA) is already a bridge too far for most…
The hunt for witches is done by both the progresses and conservatives today (by both the political left and political right), meaning conservatives, again, cannot simply escape criticism. Sure, the left (progressives) constantly seeks out victims to false accuse of racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, bigoty, or whatever nonsense, but the right also engages in this human sacrifice, often falsely accusing any dissenter or critic of being a crazy leftist, progressive, or libtard or whatever, in other words, while the left if busy hunting witches (falsely accusing people of witchcraft), the right is busy hunting witch hunters (falsely accusing people of hunting people for witchcraft). On today’s social media, it is not uncommon to see a conservative host constantly ridicule all critics as insane leftists or stupid democrats. Many conservative channels go around college campus conducting interviews with the purposes of shaming every student filmed as a “crazy leftist”, or “crazy Marxist” or “crazy woke ideologue” even if the student does not say anything damning, even if a student politely declines to be interviewed.
DDP vs Idesanya (reporter)
Do not say gay bill ” cant even say Gay Marriage legalized in 2015 (Just like you cant say “There are tribes in Africa due to Woke Mobs) (Anti-woke mob is a cult too)
So stupid , even if they were responding to the TW (who wants to invade Mexico) would still call use leftist
Plus child worship, hatred of authority
Anti-woke is just as much as a cult
Anti-woke (falsely accused boxer of being a man at 2024 Olympics)? Hunt for transgenders?
Claim movies are woke when they aren’t. Blue lives matter/White Lives Matter, answering one stupidity with another. Needless Cultural war projection
Most commenters/subscribers , even channel creator (movie reviewer) do not even watch the movies they are criticizing.
Left is busy hunting witches while Right is busy hunting witch hunters. But recently (as of 2021) right is responding to the left falsely accusing everyone who opposes them of being a racist, by falsely accusing everyone of being pedophiles
Example of Anti-woke being a cult just as much as woke (professor sues school for allegedly susepending him because he refused to grade black students more leniently after George Floyd and Anti-woke cult just assumes it to be true.
Might assume homosexuals and trans to be more prone to being pedophiles (and want to assume one guilty )
Open borders vs defense vs TW (expansion to smaller line)
Although conservatives ma be better in declining civ, they still engage in witch hunts
Left (Progressives) and Right (conservatives) is opposite of pull back toward left, and pullback toward right
The cycle of civilization means the reverse is probably the case during the period a civilization is rising (ascending, waxing) with progressive element now perhaps being slightly more tolerable than the conservative one (although they might not refer to themselves with such labels). A society trying to break the chains of its superstitious, and feudalistic past will no doubt face opposition, as again, changes are typically only accepted gradually by the populace. Scientific discovery was resisted by the Inquisition. It may be the conservatives in this case who would be trying to conserve the old obstructionist traditions of the past which kept everyone in bondage, ignorance, tribalism, and poverty with the progressives spearheading the new ideas and new practices that advance society into freedom, wealth, and enlightenment. Of course, to call them conservative is silly since what exactly are they conserving but superstitious/feudalistic nonsense?
Today’s conservatives would also no doubt reject this assessment as they will claim conservatism is about conserving the best traditions of the past, not the worst, but this can be stated now, in 2022, with the benefit of living in a time period 250 years after Western Enlightenment where much in the past was sensible and good. Does the overall population of a fledgling civilization, one who just recently started to climb out of a dark age, or the long-term ill-effects of one, have this benefit? What is in their past to cherish, to preserve? Poverty? Oppression? Missed opportunity, wasted life, for numerous generations as their people, for centuries, lie uselessly stuck in the mud? If modern conservatives object to applying the conservative label to the obstructionist element that resists change during a civilizations ascending period, so be it, it does not change the fact the obstructionist element (pull back towards the left) still would exist; if members of the conservatives today fancy themselves as so intelligent, they would realize that their reason would guide them not to needlessly defend the old ways of the past in this different time period, they probably would be more progressive (pulling towards the right) in this case.
Change is not always good though and no matter where we are in the civilizational cycle, new ideas must be vetted and tested with most, nearly all failing. Whether or not to adopt change always still depends on the circumstances and progressives, in a civilization’s ascent, would still only be producing favorable outcomes (improvements to society) in the long-term, after suffering many short-term failures, no different than a stock’s price going up in the long-term while suffering continuous short-term dips. A fledgling civilization might have a superstitious, dark past but that does not mean new ideas, new ways, will always be an improvement; they may even be worse. This might absolve the conservative elements during the waxing period of civilization to a degree while slightly dimming the light of progressives. Still the overall condition probably will not change with conservatives being less ideal than progressives during the rising stage (the blossoming) and with progressive being less ideal than conservatives during the declining stage (the withering), the latter stage we are currently in now in 2022 and have been in for many decades.
The truthful witnesses, the light of the world, the cream of civilization, those who support and defend truth, who strive to exist beyond their own time period and not be mere mindless products of their age, will still always view conservative and progressive tribes as absolutes with a degree of contempt regardless of which point in the cycle they exist. As stated, although conservatives might be slightly more tolerable in our present day, whether to conserve or not still depends on the circumstances and, since society is far gone, a restoration is needed, not a conservation. Ignoring circumstances and stating conserving or changing is always right or wrong is insulting to the human intellect.
Furthermore, during the rising period, progressives may be more tolerable, but, just like the conservatives in the declining period, they will still probably be intellectually unsatisfying since they will try to move society slowly one or two steps forward out of poverty and superstition, when the truthful witness, armed with the full light of truth unencumbered by the need to dilute the truth to win acceptance and praise from the idiot masses, is likely already 50 steps forward. The progressives being only one or two steps ahead of the conservatives, when the truthful witnesses are 50 steps ahead of the conservatives, thus 48 from the progressives, means the progressives and the conservatives look almost indistinguishable from that far distance.
Perhaps is it arrogant to say one’s mind is capable of existing beyond its own time period, but we are not behaving as modern progressives would when, under the self-proclaimed, false aura of enlightenment, they arrogantly shame their hard-working ancestors from the benefit of hindsight, while enjoying all the fruits of civilization these ancestors built. These are the actions of a spoilt child. We simply believe the truthful witness must intellectually strive to control their emotions, not being mindlessly swept up in tide of current attitudes-sentiment, and see beyond the present moment and learn about other time periods; he must strive to stay at peak enlightenment, at the peak of his civilization (and perhaps at the peak of the next great civilization), regardless of where chance places him in the civilizational lifecycle, meaning regardless of the conservatives, or obstructionists who are trying to bring everything back down (in the rising phase) and regardless if progressives, the degenerates, who are trying to bring everything down (in the declining phase). This is our mentality.
why cities are more liberal (democrat) sheltered from harsh realities of life
New Policies w
TW potential is everyone is tried of being shamed…and turned into a negative stereotype….if you challenge
Moderates are no moderate
Overton Window is being driving off a cliff (or driving our minds off a cliff). We cannot be anchored to it.
Overton Window (use Term) (good people now exist outside it as the minds of those inside crash off a cliff)
TW Tribes: (political parties often want things to get worse and people to be more miserable (might block border bill). Democrats might block xyz sensible bill to increase wages…
They had no intention of cooperating with the democratic government, knowing it was to their advantage to let things get worse in Germany, thus increasing the appeal of Hitler to an ever more miserable people.
Tribes also deserve each other: they create their counter, one side that wants to censor everything creates another that wants to say anything it wants without consequences.
Tribes want to find new bullies to beat up other bullies, and they keep getting worse.
Face based conversation impossible
RIGHT Complains about SOCIALISM but are the same people constantly complaining about CORPORATIONS.
Mental Decay: Race-baiter-Insane Leftist: Ana Kaparian is now being praised by the right cause she is turning away from left that has gone even more insane (too far) when she was always a bad person
Gay rights now supported by Right
Nuclear Bombings of Japan, shamed by Leftist 20 years ago, but now shamed by the Right (right holds leftist positions had 15 to 20 years ago) (Tucker Carlson)
Both parties/sides now are against Death Penalty (when 20 years ago only mainly the liberals/progressives mostly were.
Despite there not being a geographic basis for this (not red and blue stats but purple) unlike in 1861.
Bluster from a soft population
Trangenderism should cause
A nation of victims….ignores other side…
War on Police..ignores other side.
False Accusations of Metoo movement..ignores other side…
Objective person watches a video of a conservative and liberal debating and sees both parties made good points and bad points but the tribal minded, tribal “conservative” or tribal liberal, claims the opposing side (their rival) got OWNED, DOMINATED, OR DESTROYED in the debate. Any fair points the opposition made are ignored, brushed aside, or twisted to their worst possible interpretation.
You say retard.. Whatever offends their feelings
You say a virus came from where it originated like always..Chinese virus..
they just use helping the poor (or the little guy) as an excuse to engage in evil behavior.
PETA doesn’t actually care about animals, they just leech to a “righteous cause” to look good and feel better about themselves while causing more harm than good.
Declare guilty by default
Trigger warnings, mircoagressions, filmed saying anything that might disparage false god.
Anyone who jokes..
Wants to own everyone.
Gets worse..assaults
All false witnesses
Comes from a paranoid fear
New Inqusition:” Someone like you”
Use Silence as proof of guilt
Use heresay and circumstantial evidence as proof (oh he googled, what constituted child porn”
All are guilt till proven innocent or just always guilty even if proven.
Jokes
Convience
Politicla correctness
Getting worse
Not everyone who joins…is
Tactics of the Inquisition 1) denail is proof of guilt 2) silence is proff as guilt 3) no one agree with you 4) you had a divorce, how can you no support gay marriage , 5) you criticize conservatives, why are you not criticizing leftists , you have a double standard (ignroing responsibility)
Two Points:
They look for innocent people to sacrifice (burn at the stake)
They, as criminals, are embolden by a weak society which sympathizes with good guys
by constantly placing more and more unreasonable demands upon them, demands which expect them to increasingly sacrifice their integrity, the common good, for the false cause of the tribe, which eventually sees the innocent citizen rightfully refuse and rebuke the toxic tribe allowing the toxic tribe to then label, (publicly shame) the innocent citizen as the enemy to satisfy the tribes need for human sacrifice. Many times, toxic tribes will just continually violate personal boundaries to antagonize a person for the same result.
Shaming an innocent person as a wrongdoer and having the public go along with it is one thing, shaming a good person, for an act of good itself, for the ac`t of opposing their human sacrifice machine, and having the public go along with it is far more fulfilling to the tribe’s evil, narcissistic core.
Poor worshippers do not care when rich are scammed even though the wealth could have created more jobs
Black victims matter, but not white (line example, or racial crime example, ignoring criminal assault whites too, not just blacks)
Non Partisan people care how you came to conclusions rather than the conclusions themselves
Most tribes today have become an outlet for evil, the evil within us. Normal people see someone try to assassinate the President and thing “he is evil” but channels indulge in his justifications (even glorify) or conspiracies about it
Even if the pendulum does not swing to other extreme, it swings too slowly. We went from anything offensive (including truth) must be censored and canceled (boycotted) (2015) (under the Obama Presidency) to anything that is offensive and causes a reaction must be true (2025) (under the Trump Presidency) but even if the pendulum didn’t swing to the other idiot extreme, it took to long to correct.
People were happy to look the other way when innocents were falsely accused of racism, sexism, sexual assault, Islamophobia, a police officer here, a teacher there, another person destroyed here, another manager destroyed there,. It was not until the Inquisition threatened them they acted (should have done something about it long before Trump ever entered the political scene. Should have done something about it in 2010.
Shows a selfish population that lacks wisdom as they did not realize the angry mobs would soon turn on them and hunt them for wrongthink.
We, TW, are ahead of the curb.
Good tribes do exist; tribalism itself depends on the circumstances and in cases of the best sports teams, wonderful businesses, elite military units, the military in general, and civilized nations, like those of the West, it is logical. Not all tribes are bad, and we, the Truthful Witness Membership, strive to be one the good ones. Members here can consider themselves part of a good tribe which stands opposed to the evil tribes attempting to destroy the common good. We will stand with any good or innocent person they maliciously shame and, to their utter frustration, we will continue to expose their toxicity by speaking the truth.
We resist the popular loyalty to a tribe over truth, over the common good, over civilization