We believe people are not victims (merchandise) to be publicly shamed unjustly (like on social media), and we believe people should never be blackmailed, intimidated, or mentally tortured by threats to do so.
We believe people have a legal right not to be bullied and falsely accused by evil mobs (followers, vigilantes, gangs) when the people have done little to nothing wrong, and we believe people have a legal right not to have their piece of mind, livelihood, or life threatened by such.
We will support and celebrate the use of justified violence and punishment upon the evil abuser, to defend others, to defend the nation, and to defend humanity from their malevolent attempts to do the above, and we will support strict punishment upon the enablers.
Truthful Witness may be an online of group for the brave who resist the evils of mob justice and online vigilantism, what we see today in Western society, but this alone is not enough, for even the legal system, even due process itself, can devolve into a circus, into evil inquisition, witch-hunts, and oppression, where bogus charges, frivolous lawsuits, and kangaroo courts (show trials) are commonplace.
To ensure our brave membership says what is right in the face of threats by the evil masses and remains free, we must uphold and defend numerous core values, which also ensures our membership is one of higher quality. Our core values help insulate us from the evil and stupid and the current oppressive culture where the evil mobs (the evil and stupid) reign.
We believe acts depend on their circumstances if they are right or wrong. To ignore circumstances and say, for example, violence is always right or wrong, public shaming is always right or wrong, boycotting businesses and canceling TV shows (cancel culture) is always right or wrong, telling the truth (or lying) is always right or wrong, raising your voice is always right or wrong, having a contrarian opinion (going against the crowd) is always right or wrong, is ridiculous.
This prevents our community from being superficial, mindless idiots yelling brain-dead, feel-good slogans that do not apply in all circumstances (examples of stupid slogans: Black Lives Matter, American First, End Cancel Culture, Stop Police Violence, Support Peace and Kindness, Photography is Not a Crime, Reject the Narrative, Stand United, Cheer the Underdog, Diversity is Strength, Fight the Establishment).
This also means we will, at the very least, make some mental effort to distinguish the public shaming (and public praise) that is good from the public shaming (and public praise) that is bad, rather than being lazy and insulting real victims by lumping their abuse (their wrongful shaming) alongside the just punishment (the justified shaming) brought upon the stupid and evil.
It is our duty to think independently and critically, despite all social pressure; it is our duty to examine the validity of dissenting opinions sometimes, even having to play devil’s advocate. It is our duty to be generally judicious and wait for evidence, facts, context and all sides of the story before judging/condemning/punishing/rewarding others. We strive to have our own thoughts and views never warping these to fit any agenda, label, or popular narrative. In discovering truth, we strive to not care if such truth will be acceptable to any group or to the masses overall. This makes up less susceptible to silly tribalism, idiot groupthink, and hasty reaction.
Stupidity thrives in environments where people surrender independent thought, where they are unwilling to think critically. We shall always remain curious and will analyze things appropriately. We will not be mindlessly swept along the tide of collective thinking and the viewpoint of the times.
We will not cry, “Ban all male podcasts!” as a response to the toxic male podcasts, we will not cry “Diversity is weakness!” as a response to “Diversity is strength!” We will not cry, “Violence solves everything!” as a response to “Violence solves nothing!” We will not believe that an era of criminals getting light sentences should be answered by an era where they receive draconian punishment, we will not declare, “Believe All Men!” as a response to “Believe All Women!”
We refuse to answer one stupidity with the another, we refuse to answer one injustice with another and will do our best to resist the evil forces in the West always attempting to justify themselves by pointing the finger at another evil; we shall resist said evil forces, the dark ones always attempting impose themselves by taking advantage of counter radicalization.
We recognize that as a civilization declines, it devolves more into superstition and false accusation where innocent citizens are accused of heresy or witchcraft. Modern forms include racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, fascism, and more, such accusations which are now commonly leveled at people who speak the truth. We reject superstition, good luck charms, psychic readings, most accusations based solely on body language, accusing/charging someone based solely on the actions of their family and ancestors (in other words, condemning people for their bloodlines) and more. We believe in the value “I, and I alone, am responsible for my actions” so will not condemn a man based on the actions of another.
We reject idolatry, the type seen all over social media today, where prominent figures (channel creators, and influencers) and their channels, are declared (worshipped like) gods by their audience of subscribers-followers (cult members) which enables all forms of abuse on any dissenter and critic of that figure-channel. Idolatry is resisted here. Our leadership will do its best to discourage members from giving them (and each other) undeserved praise (examples of unwanted idolatry: “TW Leader XZY Destroys Everyone in Debates!” or “TW Member ABC Always Owns Stupid Leftists! LOL.” This (idolatry) typically will be heavily criticized and discouraged, if not outright banned. We rather receive helpful criticism and accurate appraisal than receive unhealthy praise and over-inflated valuation.
Power and success can lead to hubris and isolates people from honest feedback. If our membership becomes nothing but yes-men, nothing but mindless sycophants, our grip on reality will start to slip and we ourselves shall engage in evil, destructive behavior, no different than any other nation, movement, cult, or social media channel.
We love seeing bad guys get punished and we love seeing good guys get rewarded. Above all, this helps our community become less tyrannical as we do not police others and condemn others for channeling their aggression appropriately, like when they use violence on, or enjoy violence being brought upon, dangerous criminals and foreign enemies.
Our society now generally considers all violence as wrong and unfairly punishes those who use, or wish to use, violence on the evil to protect the community. Society is now even trying to condemn violent video games when there is nothing wrong with channeling one’s violence through gaming; most violent games have players killing bad guys anyway which is a good thing and should be enjoyed.
A man who kisses a woman on her cheek unwantingly, or a man who touches a woman’s lower back unwantingly, is nowhere near the level of the evil man who commits first-degree rape; the former is usually an utterly minor and forgivable (perhaps even laughable) offense; the latter is vile and depraved.
A man who shames others for minor mistakes, which everyone does, including the man himself, commits a far eviler act than the minor mistakes. Running a red light (unless it is broken or in an emergency or for some other logical reason) is bad, but it is far worse to run red lights occasionally then publicly shame others for doing the same (or for doing something similar, like shaming people for not coming to a complete stop at stop signs or moderately speeding); mere sin becomes something worse: self-righteous hypocrisy.
A man who scams people and steals 20 million dollars is infinitely worse than a man who simply lied on a resume so that he can get a job to earn a living; the latter is understandable; the former is inexcusable.
A pathetic internet troll who, by himself, wrongfully shames, degrades, ridicules, and enrages others online, however unbearable, is still less evil than the troll (mob) ringleader who, from a position of strength, and for no good reason, marshals thousands of (his) internet trolls upon a single, helpless target. The latter is the more severe offense.
Proper Weighing gives us balance and thus moral clarity. Furthermore, it makes us resistant to public hysteria, and the lopsided punishments that result from it (for example, radical feminists treating unwanting touching of a woman’s lower back when she is at a nightclub the same as first degree rape), and it makes us highly resistant to the evil doer’s attempt (the evil abuser’s, the narcissist’s attempt) at moral leveling, where they falsely claim good people are just as bad as them by pointing out good people’s minor mistakes.
The evil abuser seeks to create moral confusion where everyone’s minor mistakes appear equal to their depravity, all so the evil abuser, the cowardly charlatan, can escape accountability, but our values see through this pathetic facade effortlessly, as they, again, gift us with moral clarity.
register
login 
JOIN THE DISCUSSION