Decline has increased evil mob justice and evil vigilantism, and evil overall, but no matter how commonplace, no matter how popular, no matter how powerful these things are, or appear to be, backed by mass consensus and mass complacency, our membership will maintain the courage and integrity to resist. This is who we want in our group, brave people who stand, not as mere interchangeable products of their selfish age but who still somehow remain good, despite the immoral environment surrounding them, despite this environment using constant social pressure to make evil seem more and more acceptable, despite the overwhelming hordes of foolish reprobates who try to use this social pressure (bullying in groups, public shaming) to impose evil, stupid behavior as righteous and intelligent, despite these overwhelming hordes constantly seeking to divide us all based on meaningless partisan (tribal) lines while they obsessively tear down the morals of civilized society and threaten (ruthlessly shame, persecute) anyone who stands in opposition.
And make no mistake, WE, THE BRAVE, ARE NOT MERE PRODUCTS OF OUR AGE, we will not succumb to pressure and abandon our conscience, our thoughts, by following the path of least resistance by mindlessly going along with whatever society is doing at the present moment, by assuming such activity must be right, must somehow be progress, simply because everyone is doing it, simply because everyone is going that direction. Unlike them, we will not burn people at the stake simply because we live in an era of witch trials; unlike them, we will not ostracize and ignore the intelligent, the truthful, because modern politics and modern business commonly do this, as they dumb themselves down to be more “inclusive” in the pursuit of votes, cheers, and profit; unlike them, we will not engage in false accusation culture and unjustified shaming simply because false accusation, one-upmanship, and self-righteous hypocrisy, all the practices of shaming others for no good reason to appear morally superior and gain advantage, have become commonplace. The people who simply go along with whatever society is doing without question, no matter how absurd, no matter how reprehensible, are nothing but fools and tools.
By welcoming the opposite, by welcoming the brave, our membership pool can stand as one of the last remaining pockets of sanity in Western Civilization, one that still has good, intelligent people who still use reason over emotion, who stand for the common good and sensible traditional values, who resist the moral decay of society, who reject today’s modern human sacrifice where innocent people are constantly uploaded online to be publicly shamed, cyberbullied, and character assassinated (ganged-up on) by evil online mobs for petty or imaginary offenses, who resist the oppressive law created by the immoral population overall that exonerates the guilty and punishes the innocent, and who proudly resist the third world migrants and foreign invaders seeking to enslave and kill our people and destroy our nations. At the very least, we hope our group can give people a platform that allows them to speak freely, that allows them to discuss their honest thoughts, beliefs, and opinions, especially on topics modern society demands you never discuss. They can be free from persecution and speak truth.
Western Civilization is in a late stage of decline. Despite the endless waves of short-sighted (the village) idiots cheering, calling for, and actually believing in, “progress” or “social progress” on the street and online, a mass stupidity all the more remarkable as things clearly, for the most part, are only changing for the worse with the rise of disorder, selfishness, and crime, again, a mass stupidity all the more astonishing, as any sensible person would find the decline to be painfully obvious, totally self-evident, when simply looking at a world map and comparing it to world maps of the past. When comparing a world map of 1920 with a world map of 2020, the century difference between the two maps shows that in 1920, Western Civilization still controlled most of the world, its influence flowed outward, from the home countries to the colonies, while in 2020 Western Civilization is receding, the colonies have long been abandoned and the tide of influence is now flowing inward to the West as the Western Nations are being continually pressured by external enemies, invaders and terrorists from the third world.
The wealth and order we brought to the world, that we exported to our colonies, has been replaced with poverty and chaos and that poverty and chaos now flows back to us! We are no longer colonizing, or even decolonizing, we are being colonized. Instead of expanding, we have sought to build weak walls, like Hadrian’s Wall, like the Maginot Line, an undeniable sign of cultural decline. We have chosen to bunker down, to outright ignore impending foreign attacks and external danger, all while being continually pressured on our frontiers by barbarians and the influx of foreign migrants who do not assimilate to our culture but instead exist as enemy peoples within our borders to leech off our culture.
Our borders can only disintegrate, fragmenting from internal division then imploding from external pressure. Furthermore, historical record also confirms our decline as it shows that all great empires succumbed to barbarian conquest, both through invasion and unfiltered migration, from the Sea People’s Invasion of Ancient Greece, the Germanic-Hunnic Tribes’ Invasion of Ancient Rome, and the Mongols’ Invasion of Medieval China, so the notion the somehow America, Canada, the United Kingdom, Australia and all nations of the West are somehow exempt from the same grizzly fate, or exempt from collapse in general, can, again, only be attributed to utter stupidity, whether originating from a failure to learn from history or the delusional belief that one is so special, or a people are so special, he, or they, can somehow forever cheat death.
The result of this decline, this inward pressure, is injustice: the punishment and persecution of the good and the enabling and rewarding of the evil. This is due to a growing selfishness in the citizenry who no longer are willing to self-sacrifice by placing the common good, the needs of society, first, before the mere wants (the infantile demands) of the individual, so when a civilization declines, it starts more and more aiding its enemies, those who seek to destroy the common good, while attacking its own citizens, those who support and defend the common good. Spoiled brats, degenerates, vile criminals, and foreign threats are all sympathized with, exonerated, or outright praised and rewarded, while normal people are villainized, shamed, punished, and oppressed, especially if they are the good ones who defend the common good and stand against such aforementioned evil people.
For example, we see good cops constantly shamed, fired, even wrongfully charged and convicted-imprisoned, for using justified force on dangerous criminals while these dangerous criminals receive sympathy, reward (with lawsuits), or praise (martyrdom). We see those who stand against foreign migrants, invaders, entering the country illegally or being permitted to enter without assimilating to our culture, ruthlessly shamed, as racists, bigots and xenophobes, while the foreign invaders themselves receive sympathy and are granted sanctuary. We see the demonization of the sensible who stand against the perversion of transgenderism, the outright falsity of calling a man a woman and a woman a man, and the enforcement of absurd gender-neutral pronouns while we see the lionization of the perverted who demand such insane tyranny. We see normal people publicly shamed, ganged up on by evil mobs and evil internet vigilantes, while vile predators, the hypocrites, rats, and criminals, who maliciously upload normal people online to be publicly shamed are hailed as defenders of free speech and public decency. Such is the current state of affairs in Western society.
Our decline has been going on for decades, if not centuries, so by this point citizens have become so debased, so devolved, so cowardly and pathetic, that they have started to proactively engage in human sacrifice (witch trials) where they must constantly seek our imaginary enemies to destroy, so today innocent people are constantly filmed then uploaded online for petty or imaginary offenses to be public shamed, character assassinated, villainized, falsely accused, cyberbullied, and persecuted by evil internet mobs and evil internet vigilantes, all so these evil masses can virtual signal and feel safe and better about themselves. This has transformed Western society into a nation of rats, a perpetual human sacrifice machine, a spiritual (soul) grinder, and has given rise to an epidemic of evil charlatans and narcissists who try to appease the evil mobs, who try to use evil internet vigilantes, social media, and oppressive law as a dangerous weapon against the innocent, who try to feed these innocent people to online wolves for personal advancement, for online views, likes, and clicks.
These vile predators use innocent people as fodder, as tools, as merchandise, they smear (falsely accuse, slander) them, antagonize them to get a negative reaction, and then maliciously film them in times of weakness or ease, often manipulating the footage, to upload them online to be butchered as sacrificial lambs or burned at the stake as witches, heretics, wrong-thinkers, all so these charlatans-narcissists can grow their following, and virtue signal, profit, satisfy, and aggrandize themselves. These evil charlatans and narcissists are now cheered, especially on social media, because they continually feed the evil mobs innocent people to sacrifice; they are meeting the demand, satisfying the mob’s bloodthirst!
The ever-worsening state of moral decay is easy to recognize. When moral decline starts to accelerate, when people lose their civility, their moral restraint, and irrational paranoia starts to pervade, unfounded conspiracies and false accusation becomes permissible, even supported. Initially, the innocent are falsely accused of bad deeds. When moral decay reaches the later stages, however, false accusations of bad deeds are no longer even needed, you can now accuse others of good deeds. The good deeds themselves become vilified and hated. This shows moral decay is reaching an advanced state.
This clear distinction can be seen between the United States during the Red Scare of the 1950s (McCarthyism), when innocent people were falsely accused of Communism, Marxism, Anarchism, and other destructive ideology due to public hysteria, compared to the United States of the 2020s, when society ruthlessly shames, fires, charges, and imprisons police officers for clearly defending the community from dangerous criminals, all openly seen on camera. Being presumed guilty of an unseen bad deed is one thing (one might give the accuser the benefit of the doubt, that he knows more about the person he is accusing than we do), being declared guilty for an overt good deed, clearly witnessed, is a far more ominous a sign, as it shows people reject naked moral truth.
If a man is a loving husband to his wife, he will be shamed as a simp or cuck by toxic men’s groups, if a woman is devoted wife to her husband, she will be shamed as a simpleton by radical feminists, if this husband and wife have children, they will be shamed by environmentalist fanatics who see all people as parasites who waste resources. Self-sacrifice, good deeds themselves, like raising a family in this specific example, become a stigma during the twilight years of a civilization. The good man today is viewed as no more than a simpleton, as a fool.
Hypocrisy is a term misunderstood in modern society, with most people not knowing its true meaning. People incorrectly attribute hypocrisy with merely having conflicting views, saying you believe one thing, while doing another thing, or the opposite thing. For example, seeing a person wear a communist shirt while drinking a soft drink and using a smart-phone, products invented by capitalism, will compel people to call this person a hypocrite when, in reality, this is merely cognitive dissonance, likely brought on by sheer stupidity or ignorance. In a second example, hearing a woman claim, “she does not care what men think of her” while she dresses in alluring (revealing) clothing specifically to attract men, meaning she self-evidently and obviously does care what men think of her (caring about what other people think in most cases in not a choice either, it’s usually involuntary, meaning it cannot be helped) is the same cognitive dissonance, the same conflicting views, the same stupid idea, but, again, it does not equate to hypocrisy. Again, people will label someone a hypocrite for them claiming they stand for women’s rights and safety when this person also shows support and sympathy for Islamic states that mutilate and enslave women, as many clueless leftists today often do, but this conflicting stance (cognitive dissonance) is still not the proper use of the term
People also incorrectly attribute hypocrisy with mere charlatanism; for example, a Christian leader who mercilessly beats his wife in secret will be called a hypocrite once his crime is discovered because he preached Christian morals while secretly committing a heinous act, but this is evil simply hiding itself which evil always must do to avoid discovery; it would be foolish, unrealistic, to expect evil people to always commit bad deeds openly and to simply confess.
The real meaning of hypocrisy is leveling unfair judgment upon others: condemning, overly-criticizing, vindictively shaming, pointing-the-finger at, others for acts (petty sins, or minor mistakes) which everyone commits or for the very acts the one who is judging commits, or the one who is judging commits acts of near equal or greater magnitude in wrongfulness. For Western society, it’s the popularity of hypocrisy that is the major problem today; mankind always has the capacity for hypocrisy but ages where it is widespread, cheered, and even expected amongst media and leadership (meaning it is rewarded) show a significant lack of moral fiber amongst the citizenry.
A common example is today’s internet shaming, or internet vigilantism, which sees people constantly shamed for any small mistake, no matter how trivial. The evil mobs themselves, the ones doing the shaming, all commit mistakes, and they certainly would not want to be constantly filmed and recorded at all times; they would not want to be policed for their mistakes in such an immorally invasive manner where, once a mistake is inevitably committed, as happens with everyone, footage or pictures of their mistake can then be uploaded online for the world to see where they, the ones filmed, will subsequently be denigrated (face harsh, unfair, disproportionate, hyper-critical, and cruel judgement) at the hands of the unforgiving masses, yet these same evil mobs have no moral qualms with doing this cruelty to others, especially to authority figures, like teachers, police, and public officials.
For example, a teacher being filmed by one of their students, today, is afforded no leniency, no mercy, when “some mistake” is caught on camera, even if the student is clearly breaking the school’s rules by secretly recording and is generally, by releasing the illicit recording, behaving like a rat coward. The same happens to police, the vast majority of which now wear body cameras, where any mistake caught on camera, no matter how rare, no matter how minuscule, is uploaded online so the officer, the one who made the mistake, can be served on a platter, as a human sacrifice, to the evil internet mob which hates police; the small mistake is not only considered an unforgivable crime that must be ruthlessly punished, it also serves as fuel, as a convenient excuse, for the witch-hunters to grab their pitchforks and condemn all police.
People were not made to be watched all the time, and the laws of Western society were not originally designed with this technological abuse in mind, but they, the evil mob, demand “cameras everywhere” with “all footage facing public scrutiny“ for “accountability” and “transparency” because they are simply looking for any excuse to burn someone at the stake, whether metaphorically or literally, when they themselves can never meet the same unrealistic standards of accountability that they place on others. They would not their car or home searched, they would not want their browser history searched then released publicly but they still want others to face such constant monitoring. This is hypocrisy in its purest form. It is inherently repulsive, and antagonistic, to all those who recognize it, and such hypocrisy is now commonplace in Western society.
When an affair is made public, the cheaters are heavily shamed, dogpiled by the masses, half of which no doubt cheated themselves (or did something equally wrong)
A driver will be publicly shamed for driving slightly over the speed limit or for not coming to a 100% complete stop at a stop sign by the same people who run red lights. A person will be publicly shamed for being shallow by members of the opposite sex who themselves proudly maintain the shallowest, the most superficial, of dating standards, by women who only want to date men who are popular, tall, and who have high incomes, by men who only want to date women in their early 20s, who have light colored eyes and large, perky breasts. A dissident will be publicly shamed for not having a mind of their own, for being a sheep, for being interchangeable, by the very tribal morons, by the very interchangeable fools, who cannot think for themselves, who never question their political side, partisan group, or majority opinion, who choose to stay willfully ignorant sheltered safely in their echo chambers, so they never have to respond to dissenting opinions and reasonable criticism.
A business will be shamed for censorship by the same people and websites who block and delete all comments that disagree with them. A government official will be publicly shamed of being entitled by online commenters with each online commenter leaving comments like “Look how entitled all these government officials are! Don’t they know they’re public servants and should serve me!” despite the irony of such statements. Principled citizens who do not support the perversion of gay rights and transgenderism will be told “What does it matter to you how other people look and dress? What does it matter to you what other people do in their bedroom and in their private lives? What does it matter to you what other people believe? How does it affect you?” by the same people who demand others wear gay and transgender pride symbols on their clothing (like in sports) and who attempt to enforce-mandate the use of absurd gender-neutral pronouns in everyday conversation.
Police are mass shamed and falsely accused by being tyrants by seditious cretins who continually harass and constantly bark orders at them, and who, again, belittle them as public servants, as any tyrant would; police are also massed shamed and falsely accused by the evil mob for escalating, or for not deescalating the situation, when they arrest or use violence on criminals, when the criminals were the only ones guilty of escalating the situation, as the criminals willfully committed the crime and then refused lawful orders given to them by police. Furthermore, police are ordered, under threat of public shaming, false accusation, job termination, and even imprisonment to be less violent on dangerous criminals due to the demands of evil mobs and then are criticized, publicly shamed, falsely accused, terminated, and/or imprisoned for being less violent on criminals by these same mobs. The abuse is endless, the hypocrisy is endless, leading to a breakdown of community.
What is far worse, is when hypocrisy becomes aware of itself, meaning the hypocrite clearly knows they shame others for they very petty acts they themselves commit or the hypocrite clearly knows they shame others when they themselves commit equal or worse acts. This is self-righteous (prideful) hypocrisy; this displays an eviler intent, and today, this also stands shamelessly in the open for all to witness. Nonetheless, a population of unchecked hypocrites only toxifies the air and brings inevitable destruction.
Modern society has become poisonous (intolerable) for normal citizens due to this growing self-righteous hypocrisy amongst the population, the prevalence of which means the hypocrisy often goes completely unchecked. Because of this lack of character displayed by the populace, the innocent are now falsely accused for the very acts those accusing them openly do, meaning the accusers commit the acts in full public view. What this really means is the cruel, inequitable judgement being brought upon the decent citizen as a result of the false accusation, is by all accounts successful, the public shaming is successful, the evil mob’s hypocrisy flourishes, the innocent person who is victimized by it is rarely vindicated and rewarded by seeing their name cleared and the hypocrites, the false accusers, brought to justice. In fact, the hypocrites often win reward, validation, and promotion, and favorable or benign news coverage, the opposite of justice.
The innocent citizen will become enraged as the evil mobs are, by and large, successful at publicly shaming and falsely accusing them of being racist, when these evil mobs are the very people who, in full public view, especially now with social media, blatantly dismiss the viewpoints of others, and assume the guilt of others, based solely on race, a person’s skin color. They, the innocent, will be publicly shamed and falsely accused, again with the shaming and accusations somehow being successful, meaning they are publicly accepted, of being rude by the very people who openly, and gleefully, mistreat others, all clearly seen on social media. The innocent will become enraged as their public attackers are successful at falsely accusing and shaming them for being perverted when these attackers are the very transgender loons who openly declare that it is morally acceptable for a man, one pretending to be a woman, to expose himself to women in women’s bathrooms and locker rooms and for children to get sex change operations. Their attackers, the evil mobs, will be totally successful when mass shaming and falsely accusing them, the innocent, of violating the rights of others, of being tyrannical, when the evil mobs are the very people who support this malicious filming (recording) of others without consent, even in private, so the ones filmed-recorded can then be blasted all over social media as objects of scorn and ridicule.
Cyberbullies will be successful at mass shaming and falsely accusing the innocent of abusing power, when these bullies love to dogpile others, when they love to join in with their cowardly fellows to maliciously attack the helpless, using their large numbers to destroy a target, a single, therefore defenseless, person, a clear, and real, abuse of power. The brave, the principled, will be called bullies for misgendering others and such smear and libel will be ultimately prove successful, meaning the negative label-accusation is backed by talk shows, social media channels, and the public at large, even though such slanderous statements were made by the very people who misgender everyone, who call women men and men women, and who bully others into accepting this insanity and who bully women when they demand that men, pretending to be women, be allowed to compete in women’s sports, when they demand male convicts, those falsely declaring themselves women, be allowed to serve their prison sentences in women’s prisons placing the female inmates at risk.
The good citizen will be condescendingly lectured on showing respect by those who flagrantly show no respect to anyone, again with this blatant projection, this audacious pretense, being backed, being championed, by all onlookers, by all comment sections, by most, if not all, public mediums. The true intellectual will be publicly shamed and falsely accused by the other side of using stupid fallacies in a debate, when the other side, conveniently allowed to use all the fallacies they want, used numerous stupid fallacies in this debate with the public failing to recognize this truth and setting the record straight, exonerating the intellectual while condemning the deceitful. The innocent will be mass shamed for, and falsely accused of, not minding their own business, by cowardly internet vigilantes who follow and praise the very camera-predators who, in an criminal enterprise to get views on social media, constantly get in everyone’s business by invasively recording others, often peering through car windows and store windows like creeps to provoke a reaction for content, and who constantly interfere in accidents and police traffic stops, to again, provoke a reaction for content, and who advocate for the intrusive filming everyone, with this breathtaking hypocrisy, this libel, this blatantly falsely narrative, now overall going unchallenged.
Falsely accuse a person of trying to win a debate and not trying to reach a mutual search for truth by the very people who titled the debates “Our Opponents get destroyed”
Toxic Male Podcast shame OF Models will simultaneously and nakedly promoting them
Insane rioters (what they call protestors) accuse others of terrorism while threatening to burn down cities
For the good citizen, the gaslighting, the projection, the mental torture cause by hypocrisy is worse enough but the failure of justice to prevail, the failure for society, for the public, to recognize, expose, and punish the self-righteous hypocrites while vindicating those wrongfully shamed, falsely accused, and cyberbullied by them is what truly creates the poisonous atmosphere. The popularity of this self-righteous hypocrisy enables the evil abuser to be successful. Evil people will always falsely accuse the good of bad deeds and try to get them attacked in numbers, this is to be expected, but this is far more mentally damaging should this evil person commit these same bad deeds, for all the world to see, and still somehow be magically successful when falsely accusing and shaming good people for them, while he, the evil abuser, is somehow absolved, is permitted to do these very wicked deeds. Seeing large elements of the public cheer the evil abuser for negatively labeling others what the abuser themselves clearly are, inflicts great injury to the human spirit.
Political channels/commentators on social media will shame the other side of being a cult when their comment sections is filled fools brainlessly believing and cheering everything they says (brainlessly agree with him and never question-correct anything he says) when he is dead wrong, or partly wrong
Gov films everyone evveryday and you dont say anything about it (justifying complaining about survillence state while doing it to others)
Guys who call anyone who has basic respect (logical respect) for women a simp, while they simp for (idoloze, praise, worship) the “alpha male guru” bashing women online.
Self-proclaimed strong and independent women join MeToo (radical feminist cults) that shame men as all the shame when strong and independent dont join cults and are interchangable “all the same.”
First Amendment agitators hate when others excessive their free speech
Political party points the finger for other party denying the legitimacy of elections but then deny the legitmacy of elections when they lose
Same ones who accuse college kids of being weak and wanting “safe spaces” form echo chambers “safe spaces” on social media
(places where audiences come to receive validation from already held beliefs) (a place where they can feel sorry for themselves and claim to be the victim while victimizing others) (without any pushback or challenge or having to accept personal responisbility) (a convenient hangout to air imaginary grievances mostly) (channel creator is an insecure coward who desperately wants approval from the audience so he glazes them) (wants no challenge) (want a safe space)
Accusing you of misogyny by people who want men to compete in women’s sports
Might belong in hypocrisy but those who complain about body shaming shame those who lose weight. (shows both hypocrisy and failure to know what is good for them).
Innocent citizens have to witness this hypocrisy every day, and are continually tormented by it
Those who accuse others of being Keyboard warriors are the biggest keyboard warriors.
Say “Trump or President isnt above the lawbut defend career criminals and illegal aliens from the law
The degenerates of Western society constantly seek to avoid accountability by claiming the righteous shaming and condemning them have no moral right to do so because such righteous people are also sinners, wrongdoers, or otherwise imperfect. This nonsense is called moral leveling and is simply a false accusation of hypocrisy, an adult version of the childish I know you are but what am I response. Committing a sinful act and pride in committing that sinful act are not the same, the latter being far worse so there is no comparison. A driver may become frustrated after catching 10 red lights in a row to the point where he eventually starts to abandon moral restraint and starts to illegally run through them when he sees no one, and no traffic, around, again out of frustration, and this driver has no business shaming another man should this other man do the same; that certainly would be hypocrisy. Still, this driver, assuming he is a decent man, knows what he did was wrong and aims to do better; he knows he sinned in a moment of frustration, but he still strives to be good and obey traffic laws. This has no similarity with the evil man who proudly runs red lights., who sees such defiance as a mark of pride, evidence of his superiority over his fellow man. In this day, an age of unchecked narcissism, such haughtiness, not to mention illegal behavior, may even be livestreamed or broadcasted all over social media to gain attention and online likes.
The difference between sinning and supporting sin, more accurately, falsely labeling and parading sin as virtue, as pragmatic-practical, is vast. Those deplorables of the latter category will attempt to silence the truthful witnesses, those rightfully shaming them, by crying, “you had a divorce,” “you had a child out of wedlock,” “you took drugs,” “you did not volunteer enough,” so “who are you to criticize and judge me” which of course is a fallacy, a childish attempt to avoid moral accountability for one’s actions. Gay marriage, the repugnant union between two people of the same sex, is an oxymoron further contributing to the downfall of marriage in Western society, which already saw high divorce rates and a decline in having children and raising families, but the foolish, bleeding-heart advocates of its absurd legalization attacked the righteous objectors with the same hostile, yet predictable, reactions, accusing them of not having perfect relationships, of not having children, of being twice divorced, in an attempt to discredit and silence their valid criticisms, yet they, the objectors were not the ones publicly promoting their sins, or their alleged sins, as normal or noble, as some sort of virtue or sign of societal progress, the gay rights advocates were, which, of course, is the spiritual distinction between the two sides. It is the pride of sin which separates the good men from the bad men.
A man may have bedded numerous women, but even he should recognize the immorality and folly of men’s groups who see such promiscuity (such sin) as some righteous endeavor and he is well within reason to criticize men’s groups for the advocacy of such rampant fornication; doing so does not make him a hypocrite, for again, his sin, and the pride of such sin, are completely different actions. Women who do not want kids or marriage and who often dress alluringly (provocatively, immodestly) for attention can still safely criticize radical feminist groups who falsely proclaim the virtue such a selfish lifestyle. Nonetheless, despite the clear and obvious distinction, Western citizens continue to use constant moral leveling, outright lies, fallacy, and slander, in an attempt to deny truth, avert justice, and silence rational opponents of their immoral behaviors, ideas, and polices.
The lack of empathy, the overt narcissism in Western society, displayed by the evil masses, means citizens are expected more and more to believe lies, even if they are totally absurd. For example, they will be expected to see a digital prostitute, one who sells sexual images and videos of herself online to desperate men, as a fitness influencer or yoga trainer or bikini expert or digital creator, even though these silly titles are just obvious facades which give her a convenient excuse to post pictures and videos of herself with little clothing and in erotic positions and are primarily designed to lure men into her website or page so she can sell them images and videos of her body. The digital prostitute and her perverted fan base, her army of simps and supporters, will commit abuse by demanding everyone she her efforts as substantive, that they somehow create “deep, meaningful content” that inspires people stay in shape, stay healthy, be more flexible, or feel more confident, rather than being mere shallow sexual acts designed to both win online likes and money, luring in men to seduce (milk) them for money. The digital prostitute and her perverted fanbase will mass shame and falsely accuse anyone who refuses to believe this lie, despite the lie being obvious, despite it being ridiculous, despite it being completely divorced from reality.
What about OF model on Joey B Toonz who said she wants to keep OF part of her life private while posting a video to 19 million followers (or any similar example: influencing saying they want keep life private while filming and uploading everything)
Sure, stating the obvious can, at times, be unwise, as it can be rude and cruel, as with randomly calling an obese person “fat” , and such insufferable behavior can show a complete lack of refinement and awareness, often even childishness, yet this is not the issue, the issue is the mob, in this case the digital prostitute and her perverted fanbase-supporters, commit malicious abuse by actually demanding others really believe her/their absurd lies, or, at the very least, they demand that others must always keep the truth silent and pretend to believe the absurd lie when the pretense is not always appropriate and is outright harmful, they are not merely demanding others have manners and be polite and kind. When it comes time to speak plainly, to state the truth for the benefit of others and the common good, they will continually and maliciously deny the obvious and instead selfishly demand everyone else ignore reality and embrace the absurd lies, lies that everyone, including the digital prostitute and her perverted fans themselves, knows in their heart to be clearly false. This abuse, this gaslighting, the unreasonable demands of the evil mob which attempt to force innocent citizens to bestow nonexistent meaning and substance on shallow, vapid material and blatantly selfish acts is another source of utter frustration.
The evil predators wielding cameras, the agitators, the frauds, the pranksters, the ones who harass and provoke innocent people while maliciously filming them so these innocent people can then be uploaded online to shamed and mocked on social media once the innocent people understandably give an hostile reaction, say these absurd lies when they film their victims or when their victims inevitably confront them like, “I am just gathering content for a story,” or “I am here for documentation purposes” or “I am just here to do business”, I am here to film, I am not trying to cause trouble” or “I am only filming for your protection”, which are obvious lies as the predators are clearly attempting to start a fight by invasively filming others, provoking-antagonizing-baiting people, so they can create a controversial video so they can upload it to social media for profit and shameless online praise, humiliating and degrading the people they are recording in the process.
Unsurprisingly, the predators’ evil online followers, who already, like cowards, mass shame the evil predators’ unfortunate victims, level further abuse by expecting others to accept these ridiculous lies as truth, even when the predators’ social media feeds are filled with dozens, even hundreds, of videos that show provoked, negative reactions, a fact which clearly reveals the predators are the ones causing trouble and starting confrontations, as negative reactions occur wherever they go, a fact which undeniably shows the predators’ obvious intent, and their evil intent to destroy (character assassinate), not protect, the ones they film, and clearly conflict with the absurd lies.
Furthermore, it is obvious to any person of commons sense that negative reactions and confrontations are sought by these scoundrels because controversy, however manufactured, however artificial, however forced, is what brings the most online views and, therefore, revenue; if the video was just them filming benignly not getting into any arguments with those they happen to film, no one would watch, hence these camera-predators must start trouble deliberately, yet the wretched audience of such a creature, and the creature itself, demand you not recognize the clear and obvious truth. Without remorse, they callously, and even gleefully, lie and say the camera-predators are not trying to cause a scene (trouble) when causing a scene (trouble) is the only way this predator can get online views which brings revenue.
The lies get worse as many of these evil predators refer to themselves as journalists, again in an attempt to apply meaning to their shallow, cowardly (criminal) behavior; to any rational observer, they clearly aren’t journalists as they are not reporting stories/incidents but intentionally, and childishly, causing them to create drama for online clicks and views; yet the ridiculous claim that their vile behavior constitutes journalism is frustratingly backed by their immoral followers. The lies have become totally indefensible yet are somehow still imposed upon others as truth by the evil mobs, so, for the normal citizen, this causes seething outrage.
Furthermore, this camera-predator, and his evil mobs, often commit further malicious abuse by claiming “Cameras are everywhere,” as justifications for their heinous crimes of malicious filming, harassing, and online shaming (cyberbullying) when they clearly know filming with typical surveillance cameras is totally different, as this isn’t designed to personally destroy individuals, as such cameras exist for security and protection, the footage does not typically single out (deliberately target) specific people and it does not typically get uploaded onto social media so the person-people being filmed can be ruthlessly targeted by evil mobs, the brainless sheep of the predator wielding the camera. Again, they level malicious abuse by lying, by selfishly demanding others do not recognize and state the clear difference.
Delusion is to be believed or else! If a man declares himself a woman, or vice versa, the evil mobs actually demand all citizens really believe this, not just pretend to, or else face persecution! If a woman who dresses alluringly states, “I do not dress this way for attention. I just dress this way for myself” she and evil feminist mobs will abuse others by expecting everyone to believe this obvious lie although it ignores simple biological reality, that women dress alluringly for validation, to be seen as attractive to others and to specifically attract men. A slanted media channel will outright lie by claiming “our platform is for fair and honest debate” and such a lie will be ruthlessly imposed by the idiot followers of that channel even when it is clearly false, and videos titles, thumbnails, and footage are obviously edited (manipulated) to make the debate opposition look bad. The narcissism has gotten so bad that soon some nutcase will hold a stick and pretend to play music with it claiming the stick is not, in fact, a stick but a guitar and such delusion, such falsity, will be maliciously forced upon innocent citizens as truth by the evil masses.
Public gaslighting should be a crime, or at the very least, heavily stigmatized by the citizenry for the mere fact that it offends public decency, all good people hearing it. An obvious lie being peddled, for example, in the media and online, the primary public mediums, other than protesting or yelling on the street, shows a considerable degree of callousness and audacity from the person stating it beyond the point where this liar’s petty self-interest should be considered as a mitigating factor to soften punishment or spare them punishment altogether.
For example, if a professional fighter illegally kicks his opponent in the groin causing a foul were to, after the fight, in a cocky, boastful manner, continue to deny he kicked his opponent in groin, for example, by falsely claiming it was a liver kick or gut kick or leg kick or whatever, even after watching the replay that clearly shows, over and over again, his kick landed directly on the opponent’s groin, the obvious lie will naturally enrage any person with a measure of decency. If this occurred at a highly watched sporting event, meaning highly public, millions of people watching, the offense becomes more severe as a greater number of people were abused by the gaslighting; the fighter is displaying utter callousness.
In this hypothetical, it is clear concussion and exhaustion commonly caused by fighting are not a worthy excuse in this specific case, nor can they inspire sympathy which, in turn inspires leniency, as the fighter continues to defiantly and proudly make these false claims many weeks after the fight in media interviews without shame. Therefore, a resolved society would, and must, publicly force the deliberately pigheaded fighter to have to re-watch the replay and publicly recant or suffer consequences, such as heavy fines or being cutting him from the sport altogether, perhaps even escalating to imprisonment/institutionalization/righteous torture should he continue to deny obvious reality. This is the glory of a just society, one set against the narcissist, one of pure light, for the interest of the common good, the public at large is paramount. It matters not that the petty self-interest of the callously dishonest fighter is somehow served by promotion of this ridiculous lie, this outright falsehood; moral people would swiftly deliver punishment upon him and make him cease his malicious lies and force him to admit the truth in front of the whole world to allow the public, all the witnesses who were abused by his blatant lies, to be healed. This is how society should work.
Currently, there are no consequences for such callous behavior, however, as society is too weak to punish gaslighting. A get rich seminar clearly makes all its money selling its fraudulent courses, not in flipping homes or shipping merchandise or day trading stocks or currency, or whatever nonsense, like it claims it has expertise in, but it is still, today, legally allowed to publicly promote the absurd lie that most of their revenue comes from doing what they teach, even when they spend 95% of their time teaching the fraudulent course. An obvious bully can publicly make the claim that “they are only trying to help someone” after posting that person’s information and private messages online for the purposes of humiliation and spreading gossip, yet nothing is done about it. The public itself, the main victim, the witnesses to such blatant lies, are completely ignored and all is legally permitted under the false banner of “rights” and “tolerance” despite the good being denied these very things.
TV shows air people’s dirty laundry and personal drama for profit under the banner of “helping them” when it only can only lead to the people’s (the TV guest’s) public embarrassment, the very people the show claims to help. All intelligent people see this, and more importantly, can recognize the obvious lie that is being promoted as truth, yet the natural disgust and rage they feel, caused by the TV Show/TV Host’s audacious false claims, is never truly avenged. These lies, the lies we see being peddled today, are so ludicrous, so patently false, that the person promoting them must either know they are false or be mentally deranged, both possibilities which warrant incarceration.
Even if there is punishment, the gaslighting and hypocrisy are not factored into sentencing. For example, if a person is publicly abusing government officials, meaning they are broadcasting doing such, or know they are broadcasted doing such, but they also ran a social media channel on “Being a Polite Citizen,” they are not charged for the public gaslighting and hypocritical behavior, they would only be charged in the event they commit a crime against a specific individual or group, meaning victimizing the public, the truthful witnesses, is not punishable under law. Today, courts and the law are totally tone-deaf, like old men, sticks in the mud, not being able to keep up with the rapidly changing technology combined with the lack of morality, the incivility, of the age. How rewarding it would feel to watch the public gaslighters be resolutely punished and forced to confess their preposterous lies using social media and information technology, yet Western citizen’s today lack the strength to achieve such a glorious vision.
Say you are helpings someone when you are posting online to humilate and spread gossip (Dr. Phil claims to help when he wants to creates a show) (Sean Strickland claims he was helping Ian Garry about everyone calling him a cuck when he posted publicly rather than messaging him privately
Say you are helping a country with hashtag while posing in a bikini….
If you are caught abusing your children and they ran a parenting (how to parent-raise kids) channel on social media, this is not factored into the sentencing. They are not charged with gaslighting. This is even worse when they do wrong on camera..calling it right, like frauding.
SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS
Projection is when someone is falsely accused, either by the perpetrator (abuser) and/or by false witnesses, of committing the very evil act/acts they are/were a victim of hence is it strongly related to hypocrisy, if not outright synonymous. The perpetrator commits such an act due to moral cowardice, an unwillingness to recognize and confront the evil within themselves so they do not face guilt or shame and/or to prevent observers from seeing the naked truth, the huge hole (defect) the perpetrator’s character, rather they may focus on the victim who is defending themselves from the false accusation, the attack of the perpetrator. This can rightfully have the opposite effect, however, as the blame shift only further displays a lack of character, this time, the willingness to commit further psychological harm on the target and to insult the intelligence and enrage all observers, even the general public.
Do it to/Want to avoid accountability, and think they can hide their sins from God
Today, because of the growing cowardice in Western Society, however, projection has a higher chance of being successful, at least temporarily; overall, it has become far more common place as today’s villains and scoundrels are even more cowardly than the villains and scoundrels from prior generations and thus lack any fortitude to simply “own their bad behavior.”
Cheaters not accuse others of cheating…rather that owning up to it (I feel entitled to sleep with other people for reason xyz) or Robbers
Jury in 90s let OJ off with “yeah, we know it was wrong, but did it anyway to support the black man” vs today ‘”white society and anyone who opposes the verdict to let a white killer go free and deny the victim justice, is a racist.
An extorter “after his extoration or blackmail has failed” will tell the victim “You think I need your money” You think I have to bed for it”
Instead of saying “we just cannot have leftist running the country cause they believe XYZ, no borders..etc..” it is “they are trying to steal elections” while attempting to overthrow an election
“Denmark isnt doing enough for the defense of Greenland” instead of “We are just taking it and should have taken it after WW2” “No reason Canada a country of XXX number of people should have greater land mass than USA with XXX number of people, it’s stupid
Accused Israel of Genocide
Putin accused Ukraine of being Nazis even though, isnt their leader Jewish?
Germany accused Poland of aggression. (Cowardice of Nazi Germany, rather than simply saying “we are taking back the land lost to us in WWI and reestablishing land connection with East Prussia. God cheated us out of WW1 where we got a taste of an Eastern Empire and European Domination, we are waging war on God by persecuting/exterminating God’s chosen for robbing us of the victory
Remember, evil abuser does this because they have moral cowardice.
Every accusation is a confession.
Always a scapegoating, a projection now (unlike xxx Jamie who you do not scapegoat, at least now
Melanie Phillips Quote ” There is no better way of blaming people than accusing them of the very thing they are the victim of” so you accuse Israelis of genocide (of being Nazis)
Criminals now blame the judge and law enforcement “for taking them from their family and kids” when the criminals did this by committing crime and making society put them in prison.
Western society has entered such a primitive state, that one cannot even enact sensible policy by appealing to people’s self-interest. Citizens may be selfish but appealing to self-interest, especially self-preservation, has typically been the failsafe to prevent the decay of reason and emergence of tyranny, but this is no longer certain.
People are so deranged now they fist fight on airplanes during flight despite the dangerous environment of flying high in the air; undoubtably, if guns were allowed on planes, many of these people would also shoot at each other, not only showing a depraved disregard for the lives of other passengers, but utter stupidity beyond a Darwinian level, as they are so enslaved by their immediate impulses, it compels them to totally disregard their own lives as bullets could kill the pilots and damage the plane’s electronic systems causing the plane to crash or the bullets would more likely just shoot through the plane’s fuselage sucking most, if not every, passenger out into the sky to their deaths and potentially destroying the entire aircraft. Ideally, a man’s duty, his obligation to society and others, to protect such things which are greater than himself, should morally compel him behave well, such as when he is on an airplane, yet even if this honor is abandoned-rejected, self-preservation, at the very least, would still compel him to behave, because causing trouble on an aircraft, such as fist fighting, or even needlessly arguing with or antagonizing pilots, flight crew, and fellow passengers could potentially disrupt flight operations placing his own life in jeopardy. As we see countless videos today of passengers causing trouble on aircraft, whether they be physically fighting, needlessly disrespecting flight crew, or being generally disorderly, the failsafe of self-preservation appears to be no longer present in many which means today’s citizens can be especially dangerous.
Tailgating is another clear example. The duty of the driver, ideally, is to protect other people by not driving recklessly. This includes protecting the other drivers on the road, by not following other vehicles too closely, in other words by not tailgating, to prepare for cases when the vehicle in front must suddenly stop; following a vehicle too closely risks a crash, usually a rear-end collision or a crash resulting from a frantic swerving off the road by the tailgater to avoid a collision with the front car that braked suddenly, since the close proximity means that the tailgater will not be able to brake in time in the event that such a sudden stop occurs. Furthermore, everyone tail-gating makes far more difficult for other drivers to change lanes and the resulting crash could cause a major traffic jam disrupting the lives of all other drivers. Even if one were to selfishly reject such a duty, however, at the very least self-preservation, should compel people not to tailgate, as the crash that could result could be serious, even fatal, resulting in severe personal injury or death, especially as high speeds, not to mention that a crash will cause significant damage to their vehicle to which they may be emotionally attached and they will have to devote money and time to fix or replace it, as well as incur higher insurance costs as a penalty of causing a wreck.
Turn off roads slowly as if asking to be rear-ended
Two cars block the people behind (who want to pass) in by going same speed with no regard
When observing the behavior of many of today’s drivers, this self-preservation no longer appears to be present. Drivers tail-gate each other on the road at 80 miles per hour (128.75 kilometers per hour) despite its risks (a crash, collision, serious injury, and death); as stated, tailgating makes it impossible for the tailgater to brake in time should the car they are tailgating brake suddenly and, furthermore, it makes it impossible for the tailgater to react in time to avoid objects, potholes, debris, and even animals and people, on the road should the car they are tailgating see such obstructions and steer quickly out the way; the front vehicle often blocks these things from the trailing vehicle’s view, especially if the trailing vehicle is tailgating, yet drivers continually tailgate despite the danger, even well into old age. To make matters worse, today’s drivers are easily prone to road rage, provoked from another driver making the slightest mistake or even if another driver drives responsibly and/or blows the horn.
Rejecting, not just common morality, but, now, self-preservation (common sense) as well, the people praise false accusations upon others, the insane practice of assuming guilt before it is proven, and cheer senseless vigilante justice even though this will eventually pose to be a serious threat to themselves, as they too will inevitably be falsely accused-lynched, they burn down their own cities in riots, they viciously mass shame and attack brave police officers then wrongfully fire and convict them which discourages police officers from stopping bad guys and prevents good people from even wanting to become police officers in the first place which leads to more crime and total lawlessness, they refuse to swiftly execute depraved murderers which can only allow such murderers a chance to kill again and encourages more murders to be committed placing all of society at risk, including themselves, they even dismiss the danger of nuclear war with Russia and China and ignore the significance of mutually assured destruction and global Armageddon.
Feminists and queer groups are now seen standing for Islamic terrorists and radical Islamic states, even though the women would be enslaved, and the queers would be beheaded in these barbarian states. The same leftists who claim to be “against apartheid” cheer and sympathize with the oppressive Muslim states. Most those, including the political right, who condemn civilized states like Israel and support Israels enemies would, not doubt, chose to live in Israel, yet simultaneously shame Israel when it defends its way of life. Men’s groups, on the right, ruthlessly shame sluts whole simultaneously wanting a lot of sexual partners which requires sluts; they shame women for wearing make-up but also want women to look beautiful and less masculine.
Selfless (women should submit to men and be good wives)
Selfish (women do not have to adhere to gender roles and can do whatever they want)
Self-destructive (anyone can be a woman, including men and participate in women’s sports)
The self-destructive idiocy is seen even in combat sports where fight fans always tend to unfairly shame the fight promotions for not paying fighters enough, when the increase in pay they demand fighters get would effectively bankrupt the fight promotions, eliminating the entire sport. Furthermore, it would effectively incentive fighters to fight less frequently, again, hurting the sport. They would, for example, hypothetically cheer a popular fighter getting paid an astronomical $1 billion dollars for a high-profile fight, or any unheard-of sum for the time, even though the promotion paying would be financially ruined, even though it would incentivize the fighter “not to aggressively engage but instead avoid damage,” during the fight making the contest dull.
Today, it is not uncommon to see fight fans of MMA (mixed martial arts, the UFC specifically, the premier MMA organization), currently (2020s) a rising and superior sport (meaning it’s more exciting-dynamic than boxing due to the inclusion of kicks, submissions, grappling, knees, elbows, hammer fists/back fists, different marital arts disciplines, etc,. whereas traditional boxing is just limited punching above the waist with overly-large, padded gloves and is clearly outdated and traditional boxing pays fighters too much simply to show up, which, as stated, incentivizes boxers to fight rarely, and, when they do manage to finally step into the ring, run around to avoid taking damage), cheer when MMA fighters transition into traditional boxing (traditional boxing still currently has more money partly due to it being more established) for a quick pay day, despite 1) boxing being far less entertaining, 2) the MMA fighter having almost no chance of winning as he/she is usually pitted against professional boxers (men who have specifically been training professional boxing their entire lives, whereas the MMA fighter has specifically been only training MMA), no different than a lion foolishly trying to fight a shark in the ocean, the shark’s domain or a shark foolishly trying to fight a lion on land, the lion’s domain 3) it placing the MMA fighters health, specially their brain health, at far greater risk, as he/she will inevitably take a beating in a boxing match from the better trained boxer; the damage might also shorten their fight career, and 4) it ensuring the fighter fights in MMA less frequently thus hurting the superior MMA product overall due to fighter inactivity.
Examples of this self-sabotage demanded by the fans are with Conor Mcgregor and Francis Ngannou. The former the most famous MMA/UFC fighter in history up to this point and the latter, perhaps the scariest knockout artist, the heaviest hitter, in the heavy weight division up to this point. In the case of Mcgregor, his massive $100 million dollar pay day to transition into boxing and novelly fight all-time great and undefeated boxing champion Floyd Mayweather, was cheered and celebrated by MMA audiences; financially, the event was seemingly successful, again, despite the common sense that the boastful, charismatic Mcgregor, despite his confident (snake-oil) claims he would emerge victorious by quick knockout, stood practically no chance against one of the best boxers in history, as Mcgregor was not trained, and never competed, in professional boxing.
Unsurprisingly, Mcgregor lost the contest by technical knockout, but the real damage was greater as, prior to his idiotic boxing match, he fought in the UFC continually (2 fights a year on average), whereas after, due to the huge sum of money he received from the boxing bout, he rarely fought (1 fight every three years, he took roughly two years off to compete in the boxing match to begin with and when he returned, he never looked the same), thus damaging the MMA sport overall, starving it of its most entertaining star. The fans not only paid to watch an incredibly stupid, poor-quality event, a lackluster boxing match whose outcome was all but certain, they, due to their short-sightedness, cheered, and participated in, a blatant undermining of their own beloved sport.
Conor Mcgregor (late 2016) was at his highest point in the UFC, just winning championship belts in two different weight classes, the first in UFC history, and, furthermore, winning dominantly, when he needlessly ventured into boxing. For comparison, this would be like if Stone Cold Steven Austin, perhaps professional wrestling greatest superstar, at the height of professional wrestling, the Attitude Era (mid-1997 to mid-2001), the greatest time in the pro-wrestling industry in terms of quality and storytelling, needlessly took two years off to do body building or arm wrestling, a far more boring activity, and something he had no chance of winning if pitted against naturally skilled competitors who have been training these activities their entire lives, at a time when profession wrestling was dominating the culture and fascinating public imagination by continually pushing boundaries with its violent, sexual, rebellious (pro-blue collar, anti-corporate) content.
This is how foolish Mcgregor’s transition into boxing was, this is how damaging it was to the MMA sport, yet the pathetic freakshow was still generally cheered and backed by the stupid masses of fans. Imagine if NFL Players, (professional American football players), took significant time off from playing the game to go pay a version of football far more effete, like touch football or flag football or even soccer (what the rest of the world considers football), and then imagine this shameful trend being generally cheered (backed) by the fans. The proof is obvious in this case, they (the fans) simply are no longer intelligent enough to know what is good for them.
The situation is the same when it came to Ngannou, his second sidetrack into boxing saw him viciously knocked out in under two rounds in humiliating fashion, likely causing a level of brain damage (and resulting health issues), and certainly causing utter public embarrassment, far greater than any multi-million payday can justify. The idiotic fans egged him on though in this moronic endeavor, emotionally intoxicated by Ngannou poor man’s “hero journey” while criticizing the “evil, rich” UFC for not allowing Ngannou, who was the UFC heavyweight champion at the time, to go box, which forced Ngannou to vacate the belt and leave the UFC for another lesser organization that would allow him to box.
France Ngannou was already well paid by the UFC (he was even offered a more lucrative contract), and was therefore, rich by nearly all metrics, so this concept of “the poor man” already has its problems, it may apply to the fighter’s past but certainly not to his status at the time, nonetheless, the notion of Ngannou finding financial success outside the UFC monopoly, was too irresistible for the fans to resist, yet fans were too stupid to realize Ngannou’s personal benefit hurt the sport overall, for fans were denied legendary matchups that could of occurred had Ngannou remained in the UFC, such as Ngannou vs Tom Aspinal, the most promising rising contender at the time and eventual champion, Ngannou vs Alex Periera, a kickboxing champion who transitioned into the UFC with massive success rapidly winning championships in two different weight classes, and especially Ngannou vs Jon Jones, the legend of the sport and perhaps the greatest MMA fighter of all time. Sports fans were so foolish, they could not realize that what is good for an individual fighter, Mcgregor and Ngannou in these cases, is not necessarily good for the sport; in fact, it clearly proved to be the exact opposite.
Fighter pay is typically a balancing act, you do not want to pay too much or too little and, to keep the sport exciting, increases in performance bonuses, for amazing knockouts, exciting fights, impressive submissions, great wins, and high PPV sales, and perhaps even bonuses for fighting toughest match up, as opposed to hand picking easier opponents should be more preferable than large increases in base fighter pay or show money, the money a fighter gets for simply showing up (even if he sleep walks through the fight). Still, fans, like all Western citizens, are so irrational, they cannot think and instead advocate feel-good, kneejerk polices which undermine their own cause. They want novelty (cross combat sport events) circus fights, a freak show, where the lesser sport dilutes the overall product (like ruining the meal by pointlessly mixing a great spaghetti sauce with a bad one), and they want fighters to get paid millions even though this encourages the fighters to never fight or train or keep updated in the sport and will bankrupt all MMA promotions, all because they want to cheer for the little guy when their short-sight policies only can end up hurting the little guy in the long run.
The stupid trend of “popular MMA fighters transitioning into the inferior combat sport of boxing” has created a coddling culture where pro-boxers continually boast about their pathetic abilities and taunt MMA fighters (usually on social media) while challenging them to a boxing fight for a quick, easy payday, since, again, MMA fighters aren’t trained in professional boxing, meaning under boxing rules, usually under the fake, tough-guy mantra of “I will fight you, any place, any time!” but, of course, the contemptible boxers fail to mention they will do so “only in a boxing ring, only with boxing rules, only with large boxing gloves on, only against people not primarily trained in boxing!” insulting the public’s intelligence.
Everyone knows that the only way for a skilled boxer to win against a skilled MMA fighter, all things being equal (like size-weight class and years training), is to cripple the MMA fighter by forcing him to fight a boxing match (under boxing rules: no kicks, elbows, knees, back-fists, takedowns, grappling, submissions) whereas any other fighting scenario, whether in a cage, whether on the street, whether even in a kick boxing (muay thai) match (meaning even with no grappling/submission threat), whether in MMA rules, even if the boxer is allowed to start the match with brass knuckles and perhaps even a pocket knife, the MMA Fighter would almost always emerge victorious.
The fans, by cheering and paying for such garbage, have undermined the MMA sport so much they have created an industry where the weaker from a lesser sport can exalt themselves, and protect-extend their fake records, their more artificial fighting style, their false aura of superiority, the life span of an outdated sport, at the expense of their favorite fighters of their own, better sport. Professional boxers can essentially gaslight MMA fans and the public at large that they are better than MMA fighters by continually beating them in these unfair (rigged) boxing contests; justice (punishment or karma) for the boxer having such a limited (outdated) fighting style is never realized and instead we have an industry of illusion, of sheltering, of childish pretense, where boxers can avert/delay the consequences of reality and instead boast, self-congratulate, and make false, self-serving claims regarding their own ability, about the emptiest of accomplishments.
The fans have allowed more talented fighters to be undermined by far less talented fighters seeking participation trophies and easy money. No wonder this garbage keeps polluting combat sports, fans keep idiotically paying for it, no different than the Hollywood no longer writing good stories but instead making inferior remakes constantly because the people keep paying it; the fighting industry, like the movie industry, is no longer incentivized to try and create quality entertainment. It is important to note, however, that professional boxing itself, despite the above heavy (but valid) criticisms, is also damaged by this nonsense, as the best fighters (it may be generous to even call them fighters) in these boxing promotions are ignoring each other to fight sideshow boxing matches against MMA fighters, virtual amateurs.
Same rigged fights we saw in Ancient Rome by Charlatan Emperors
No different than decline of Attitude era (fans demanding less story and more superficial wrestling, and any one they love to get the belt
Like WWE (fans demanded all fan favorites get the belt) which declined the industry. demanded less story and more flash
By 2020 (even 2015) it was clear MMA was the new rising sport. Anyone who went into professional boxing after this date, especially 2020, is clearly a weakling, evidenced by the trend of influencer boxing. Insults public intellect especially their big pay days and events which never deliver any excitement except men hugging.
The protection provided by the armed forces of the West, by its military might, has granted the security and freedom for Western citizens to enjoy and engage in sports, overall. A man couldn’t make a living fighting in a ring or cage or by drippling or by catching or by kicking a ball without such protection. Unfortunately, this security and freedom has been granted for so long, that lesser sports like the aforementioned boxing, and, even more so and especially, golf (hitting a ball with a stick, then walking after it, then hitting it again) are allowed to flourish and provide meaningless livings to those who can professionally engage in these silly activities, with the most successful participants being idolized by the masses for their fame, wealth, and “supposed talent”, despite the activities being sheltered from all reality, from the external enemy who does not play by the rules, the rules silly sports demand, (the barbarian, the enemy, will not fight you fairly with only 11 combatants just because you have only 11 combatants, he may fight you with 311 combatants), and, in the case of golf, having zero real world use.
Luck is largely a determining factor with these sports anyway, not so much as with beauty, as playing a game better than other lucky people still requires a degree of skill, but luck is generally still the main factor, such as with professional hockey players almost always having birth days the first half of the year, boys born in the second half of the year are simply out of luck, as they are weeded out at a young age because they are unfairly competing with boys a year older, yet sports players are still commonly worshipped by the masses unjustifiably and citizens have no higher purpose than watching athletes hit a hockey puck or dunk a ball on TV or at an arena. Like the Romans in the Colliseum They are placated by sports, and will demand increasingly sillier sports, as their society gets more debased and crumbles.
As time goes on, and Western civilization continues to decline, citizens will more and more abuse the security and freedom that has been provided to them by the hard work, ingenuity, and bravery of both their ancestors and current service members, the ones guarding the borders, by engaging in even more stupid competitive activities, like slap fighting and (disgusting) eating contests, all so they can pretend to be better than they actually are and can earn a living, feign expertise about nothing while inventing useless terminology, again, about nothing, and, as always, feel better about themselves (No Different than Academia making more and more stupid-useless degrees as time goes on) The more they engage in idiotic activities and attempt to monetize them, the more they are asking for (and deserving of) a beating, for God, or karma, or fate, to inflict upon them a reckoning.
Cannot claim “something is wrong with homeless or disabled (so cant fix it) (probaby cannot even use these terms (defeat their own cause)
MMA (UFC) Might degrade over time like boxing
An Example in Social Media Content with Sports (and stupidity of Democracy)
Majority Demand MMA analysis channels release fight predictions early (NOW NOW NOW) rather than day before the fight or day of fight despite this being stupid and making the predictions worse (as it does not factor changes: what if fight has staff infection, a bad weigh cut, arrived later and got no sleep or whatever
Self-destructive: even drug dealers killer/overdose their own buyers (with fen…and)
Cops side with frauditors who will upload them online as human sacrifices (so if citizens defend themselves from frauditors, they will arrest them)
Protestors seditiously fly flags of countries they never want to visit, living in, or be deported to (like flying the Mexican flag when protestors are attacking ICE and government agencies trying to deport illegals, even those that committed heinous crimes.
Soldiers say they rather fight in Jungle or Urban , when these are ideal unlike plains and desert where Western powers have the advantage.
The public reaction to jokes or sarcastic comments makes it clear to the self-sabotaging nature of the population; their emotions make them so utterly stupid, they cannot identify jokes or sarcasm, and instead take everything literally. For example, the joke/sarcastic comment “he is black, so he must be a guilty” as a reaction to a black man being assumed guilty of a crime without sufficient evidence, is taken at face value to be serious, and the public mob will attack the person who made the witty remark falsely accusing him of racism, of assuming black people to be criminals, even though it is clear the speaker believes the exact opposite of that; the joke/sarcasm was specifically meant to expose the absurdity of such a belief, and the absurdity of people who hold such a racist belief, but the evil mobs nonetheless will attack and target the speaker ruthlessly, to the point where they will attempt to get him fired from his job and force him to publicly apologize for something he did not do, under the banner of “ending racism.” The evil mobs, who vow to “end racism” are, by and large, too stupid to recognize the speaker was on their very side with the remainder, in bad faith, such as the evil mob’s ringleaders (malignant narcissists and evil abusers-opportunists), cravenly seeking to destroy (sacrifice) the speaker by slander, by false accusation, despite them being fully aware the comment was a joke/sarcasm, all so they may proclaim (virtue signal) their holiness, their purity.
In the end, they seek to “end racism” by targeting someone who actually “stands against racism,” showing how crazy, how self-destructive they are. A joke attempting to rationalize men beating women, such as, “Why not hit women, as a man? The whole purpose of guys hitting women is because women are physically weaker, and thus cannot fight back and hurt us back. Seems smart” would meet the same hysterical reaction by the public at large, with false accusations that the speaker is a woman beater, despite the comment making jest how cowardly woman beaters are.
Law and Order, a popular television show, aired an episode where a white woman did not want to press rape charges on a young, black man because of “racism” and because she considered herself the beneficiary of “white privilege” which saw the detectives, the main characters of the show, react with shock and abhorrence, where then they tried to convince (successfully), the woman, the rape victim, out of this crazy, self-blaming mindset, the victim ended up identifying and condemning her rapist on the stand, yet the episode was blasted by many rightwing mobs “as woke propaganda garbage that promotes the insane idea that black people should not being charged with crimes, including rape, because white people are evil” despite the main characters of the show standing against, and successfully fighting against, that very insane idea, being fully aware of the dangerous leftist (woke) agenda which promotes white guilt and unjust exoneration of black criminals; a valid criticism of the episode was, although the rapist was convicted, he took a plea deal and was treated with too much sympathy (which happens often in the show no matter the criminal’s skin color or age), yet the episode did generally have the main characters resist “the woke agenda” not support it despite the hysterical rightwing mob’s claims; again, the self-righteous mobs undermine their own cause by their own hysteria, by their own purity tests, which compels them to find enemies to shame, including those on their own side, those who support their very position.
The above examples demonstrate that Western citizens, more and more, are selfishly willing to attack/destroy someone who actually stands for the good cause, so they themselves can cravenly appear like heroes of the cause. Making jest of rapists who drug girls (use roofies) so they can have sex with girls as the girls lie passed out (like wondering how a rapist determines the number of roofies he gives a girl; does he give the tall, heavier girl three roofies and the short, petite girl one roofie, or does he just give the short, petite girl three roofies anyway: giving her way too much of a dose relative to her small body weight?) again, to make rapist seem pathetic and desperate (the joke also makes lighthearted fun of small sized girls), is falsely declared rape advocacy, or are the very least, declared offensive by those looking to virtue signal and sound important because they “take the issue of rape seriously” at the speaker’s, the person who actually stands against rape, expense, meaning the craven destruction of the speaker’s character.
A respectful woman on a male podcast can disagree with the prostitute, also invited to the podcast, objecting to the prostitute’s immoral lifestyle, and the comments still level vicious insults to the former as well, despite both the audience and respectful women objecting to prostitution. A person on the other political side may even up agreeing with the opposing political side but that side still invents ways to attack them. The citizens who advocate black children having better opportunities will often simultaneously unfairly criticize and condemn white people who adopt black children, giving the black children a home education, and good upbringing, undermining their very mission.
Mocking evil, (the wicked, which is what God does) not sees you labeled as wicked.
White people who adopt black children are now being attacked as racist despite them giving black kids a home, education, and good morals, doing the very thing the race hustlers advocate for constantly.
Attack white people who adopt (and provide a good home to) black kids (UFC Fighter Michael Chandler says he was not raising black boys to be black men but boys to be good men and is attacked (told he shouldnt adopt despite giving black kids a home) (not raising black boys but boys was his actually comment, men who protect the weak)
Cant say Homeless, Can’t say retarded (even if these are literally true) (so denies truth of condition and so can never be really addressed and solved).
Saying “Gays for Gaza” is like saying “Jews for Hitler”. It’s stupid, ignorant and self-destructive.
Russian Neo-nazis (even though Hitler wanted to exterminate Russians/Slavs as a people)
BLM, Frauditors, as if they think they wont be sacrificed themselves
People have become like pets, who frantically might run into the street and get killed by being run over by a vehicle. They are so stupid have to be protected from themselves. They aren’t mentally capable of knowing what is good for them.
Selfish behavior has devolved to self-destructive behavior, or narcissistic behavior, preventing people and government from making rational choices based on common interest, including base survival. Today’s citizens behave as unchangeable, unrepentant primates with no ability to control their emotions and intelligently look more than a few days or hours or minutes or even seconds into the future, so they pose a serious danger to themselves and others. The women post nude photos of themselves on social media, and people post embarrassing videos online for immediate likes (approval) despite the fact that such mindless-indecent material remains on the internet forever and will pose significant embarrassment to the person and their family for generations into the future. If people feel someone or something is right, it must be right, if they feel someone or something is guilty, it must be so, and that person must be destroyed immediately, even though such rash judgment-punishment provides no benefit. Ultimately, this is why the people now mindlessly gravitate to evil charlatans, narcissists demagogues, and inquisitors, these vile creatures are the ones appealing to the people’s immediate impulses.
Once moral decline reaches its final stage, when evil charlatans, narcissists, demagogues, inquisitors, and evil abusers rule the land, enact tyranny, and enslave the populace in totality, the civilization faces imminent destruction. In this stage, treacherous, cowardly citizens have resorted to attacking their own innocent countrymen to such a degree that they no longer maintain the resolve to defend their nation against foreign invasion; in fact, such cowardly citizens by this point, will demonize staunch defenders of their nation while praising the barbarous foreign peoples who threaten it; moral decay is so great by this point that demonizing-persecuting patriots and praising-helping foreign enemies, blatant treason, is not seen as evil, in fact, such reprehensible behavior will be perceived publicly as good, even heroic, by the gradual process of perversion.
Good, brave citizens, the real ones, not the fake ones declared good by narcissistic manipulation or public gaslighting, do live in this time in sizable number, but the noble person soon discovers there is no point defending a society that considers them nothing more than a piece of garbage for defending it. Even so, by this dark period, the oppression of society has gotten so harsh that these remaining good citizens understandably see the internal enemy, their evil-inquisitive-narcissistic contemporaries, as worse than the external enemy. This condition, this tipping point, where the citizenry of a declining civilization, so polluted by selfishness and narcissism, become morally worse, more morally darkened, than the savage hordes they are defending against, creates an inevitable comeuppance: it allows these savage hordes, the barbarians, to invade the civilization largely unopposed. This is because, while the evil citizens are too busy persecuting the innocent within their own society, the good citizens in a twisted way now see the barbarians as liberators who will save them from their fellow evil citizens who are persecuting them; the good citizens want freedom from their evil overlords, even from their evil neighbors.
If the barbarians are not seen as liberators by good citizens, at the very least, they are perceived as avengers who can bring retribution upon their oppressors and upon the oppressive society the good citizens have grown to despise after years of bondage, persecution, insidious taxation, and ruthless exploitation. Their country is so no longer their country, it is now a vile, distorted imitation, and according to good citizen’s discernment, righteously deserves to be destroyed. Ultimately, whether they are good or evil, during the final stage of decline, citizens no longer resist the invading barbarians conquering their state. This sees the civilization then collapse, as the invading barbarians raze cities to the ground and commit mass genocide while imposing their own culture.
Ancient Rome is the best historical example of this with moral decay in Roman society reaching its final stage in the hundred-year period between 376 A.D. and 476 A.D, the former year marking the beginning of the Gothic Wars, when the enfeebled Romans foolishly allowed hostile German tribes to migrate freely into Roman territory resulting in widespread destruction and military catastrophe at the Battle of Adrianople in 378 A.D., and the latter year which marked the total dissolution of the Western Roman Empire after a century of barbarian invasions. Undoubtedly, any patriotic Roman who tried to oppose the barbarian menace in this 100-year period would have been viciously demonized, as a racist or its ancient equivalent; Roman citizens during this time became more malevolent than the barbarian invaders, a condition which brought about Rome’s destruction. The tyranny which emerged in the Late Roman Period did not end completely in 476 A.D, however. Its wormy remnants lived on for many decades after the Western Empire’s collapse, surviving by remaining burrowed within every facet of the surviving Eastern Roman Empire: Byzantium, a corrupt, oppressive state, its capital, Constantinople, protected mainly by its strategic position, whose tyranny, an oppressive hell, rivaled the anarchy, a savage hell, of the ravaged, war-torn, barbarian-occupied Western Empire. Dark Age citizens of Europe had no place of sanctuary and could only live in these two different extremes, these two different hells: tyranny or anarchy.
The bad guys are growing bolder and are growing in number because the West is losing its resolve to fight. This is typical of a declining civilization, as the Roman Empire lost its resolve to fight barbarian invaders, usurpers, as well as rogues and thieves raiding caravans, a fact which stands in stark contrast to Rome’s earlier periods when it provided excellent security to its citizens and showed massive resolve with its victory over Carthage in the Punic Wars, its conquest of Gaul under Julius Caesar in the Gallic Wars, and its conquest of the majority of Britain beginning with the reign of Claudius. During these earlier periods, the Roman showed the ability to recover from major defeats and the legions showed a willingness to inflict mass slaughter on all barbarian tribes who resisted and they had the will and tenacity to construct large, fortified walls and obstacles, many miles long, difficult feats of engineering, to defeat their enemies, like in the Battle of Alesia (52 B.C.), whereas , in later periods, the Romans were too weak to leave their homes and baths and outsourced fighting to minorities and barbarians residing in the empire.
For the West itself, its feebleness, its emasculation is obvious. Smacking and spanking children has been outlawed, as child abuse, even if the children are willfully misbehaving and causing trouble and this has led to an epidemic of uncontrolled brats terrorizing the classroom, the community, and the home, as they do not fear adult discipline and authority. Security can now only “observe and report” even when a shoplifter is clearly caught and starts fleeing or a trespasser is a refusing to leave after being ordered to do so when, decades earlier, security could forcibly restrain, tackle, and remove such criminals to protect the property they were guarding. The police are no longer allowed to place suspects in chokeholds, nor are they allowed to punch suspects in the face even if these suspects are vile criminals who are resisting arrest and fighting law enforcement, a fact which only emboldens such criminals.
The Death Penalty itself has been all but abolished in the West, even in cases where guilt is certain and, in a time, where forensic advancement and surveillance technology make achieving certainty far easier, and, even in the few states the Death Penalty is still technically enforced, the courts rarely enforce it as there is almost always an unscrupulous member, or members, of the jury who sympathizes with the depraved criminal and stops the Death Penalty from being rightfully rendered, and even when the Death Penalty is sentenced upon a vile criminal it is never swiftly enacted and, in many cases, appealed for years, even decades, and/or downgraded to a life sentence. This cowardice further emboldens vile criminals, as it shows them the community is afraid to do to depraved monsters what they, as depraved monsters, are not afraid to do to the innocent, leading to more serious crime. (Sympathize with murderers)
Isrrael Hamas Attack Oct 2023 (people are trying to understand both sides when Hamas raped women and cut babies heads off. (Israel disarmed means Hamas takes over and kills all Jews, Hamas (and people of Gaza disarmed) and Gaza is left alone.
At least say how people are trying to understand both sides when on side is evil
The U.S. military is become less American and more Hispanic, as Americans rather web surf, online date, play video games, and watch TV, social media, and pornography rather than engage in self-sacrifice and hardship by fighting on the battlefield. The West no longer bombs cities of enemy nations and can no longer has the resolve to win wars as shown with the American military defeats in Vietnam, Somalia, Iraq and Afghanistan. The Western Nations rather use their own troops as cannon fodder by funneling them into dangerous environments, kill zones, jungle and urban combat and any terrain that greatly favors the defenders-enemy guerillas, rather than risk causing any collateral damage to populations that are blatantly hostile and totally barbaric, as they are harboring and aiding such guerillas and insurgents. The West cannot even respond to new threats such as cybercrime and the rise of cybercriminals and online scams, with psychological operations from enemy states, who use online stories and commenting to stir division among Western citizens, now becoming ever more common. As each generation gets worse and worse, it is less willing to fight evil, as it becomes more concerned with shaming and persecuting the good, especially those who stand against such evil. Rightfully disciplining a child, stopping vandals, looters, and robbers, or shooting enemy combatants now risks public shaming, lawsuits, and/or prison for the noble citizen attempting to defend his community, so there is no incentive for heroism; there is, in fact, the exact opposite as acting heroically can bring harsh punishment, while shaming heroism, being a coward, can bring great reward, or at the very least, avoid such harsh punishment. This lack of resolve, this shaming and punishing of heroism by the immoral populace, will inevitably result in the West becoming increasingly feeble, oppressive and crime-ridden until it is inevitably overrun and conquered by foreign peoples, the same fate suffered by all great empires.
We, at Truthful Witness, understand the cycle of civilization and see that the West is in danger as the cycle is repeating itself. The citizens of the West are gradually becoming worse than third world barbarians and, overtime, eventually will become worse than even the murderous Islamic hordes seeking to annihilate them. The situation is no different than what the Roman Empire faced, an increasing morally debased citizenry, as the Empire was continuously threatened on its frontiers by the Germanic barbarians across the Rhine and Danube Rivers. Today, while the Western Nations persecute their own citizens, Barbarians, enemy nations and enemy peoples, again threaten the West on the frontiers: North Korea, Iran, Mexico, Indonesia, Militant Islamic Extremists and Militant Islamic States, etc. Even in the face of malevolent narcissism, evil inquisition, and social tyranny, the internal enemy, however, we will never forget that barbarians, the external enemy, are still barbarous, and, therefore, bring slavery, destruction, and death of their own; they threaten the West with genocide. We will not be content with the notion that one devil is better than the other; we will not compromise with either devil. We believe in vigilance and strength on our frontiers, and we maintain the resolve to support justified aggressive warfare on our enemy’s foreign soil, almost always a better alternative than fighting on our own soil, and we believe in threatening foreign enemies with nuclear annihilation and total destruction.
The evil within our own society, narcissists, psychopaths, sociopaths, enablers, see the light and, by cowardice, reject it, but the barbarian cannot see the light at all. Their culture is simply opposed to the West and seeks to conquer it by hostile migration, terrorism, and/or conventional force of arms. Israel is surrounded and threatened by hostile Muslim states always plotting its demise with countries like Iran, always scheming to develop nuclear weapons so it can wipe the Jewish state off the map while both South Korea and Japan, Western allies, are continually threatened by North Korea, a totalitarian state that already possesses its own nuclear arsenal and continues to brazenly defy the United States. The European countries, like Germany, France, and Great Britain, are seeing ever greater waves of hostile Muslim-Arab migrants while on its indefensible 2000-mile southern border, the United States faces continued hostile migration by Hispanic invaders from Mexico. Australia too faces waves of migrants, boat people, from a northern enemy, Indonesia. These migrants do not assimilate to the culture of the host country, instead they oppose it by keeping their own barbaric cultural practices which conflict with Western values. This multiculturalism can only lead to collapse, fragmentation, and balkanization, as with Yugoslavia. Furthermore, all Western countries are facing intensifying waves of terrorism by Islamic extremists, the most notable being the September 11th, 2001 attacks which destroyed the World Trade Center in New York City. These are modern barbarian raids which seek to kill and enslave Western citizens, and these raids can only become more frequent, more deadly, as Western society continues to weaken against foreign threats.
Russia has recently become emboldened after witnessing the political fraction, lack of resolve, and the military ineptitude of the United States in the USA’s embarrassing year of 2021 when conspiracy-driven, rightwing insurrections were allowed by emasculated police to storm the U.S. Capitol Building nearly unopposed as these insurrectionists attempted to overturn (steal) an election while they hypocritically protested about an election being stolen and when the U.S. Military, in a chaotic scene, retreated and was ultimately defeated and humiliated in Afghanistan. Like a cunning opportunist sensing weakness, like a predator smelling blood, and in response to NATO expanding ever eastward, the Russian Army, under Vladimir Putin, invaded the Ukraine knowing the USA was too weak to offer meaningful opposition and that war still rages on at the time of this writing, threatening the world with nuclear holocaust should the war escalate.
Furthermore, Western civilization, despite all its internal conflicts, has to face Eastern Civilization, primarily an ascending China, a nuclear power, which has become a rival to the United States of America and threatens Taiwan (the Republic of China), a Western ally, and epicenter of microchip technology. Maritime focus has seemingly shifted again, from the Aegean Sea, in Ancient Greek times, from the Mediterranean Sea, in Ancient Roman times, from the Atlantic Ocean, in Modern European times, to the Pacific Ocean, in our time. China has the advantage due to its much larger population, which dwarfs the United States, and due to its geography, 80% of its massive population resides in the East, on or near its Pacific Coast. By contrast, the United States, which has well under half the population of China to begin with, only has about 20% of its current population residing in its Western half, even less on or near its Pacific Coast. China holds the edge in this new battleground, and, over the last few decades, it has modernized and has largely caught up with Western technology. The Chinese now stand as the prime challenger to the Americans and to all Western civilization, in an opportune time when Western society is experiencing the lowest birthrates in its history and when Western citizens are losing their resolve to fight and are too busy cutting each other’s throats.
Social media will capture police body camera footage of an officer fatally shooting a knife-wielding maniac who violently charged at the officer. The fatal shooting would normally be a good outcome, case closed, as a vile criminal who posed a serious threat to the community was stopped and killed; the officer did his job; he protected his life and society, but today, the evil does not stop there, however, as the footage is then released publicly, which now often sees evil online mobs overwhelmingly criticize and condemn the brave officer while they sympathize with the knife-wielding criminal. The evil online mob will, again, outright lie and claim the officer should have de-escalated the situation, when the maniac was the one responsible for the escalation to malicious violence which then forced the officer to use lethal force to stop him; this evil mob when then claim the officer should have first used non-lethal force when the officer only had seconds to respond to being fatally stabbed added to the fact that non-lethal weaponry, such as pepper spray and tasers, often prove unreliable, especially against a fast, determined aggressor; this evil mob will then claim the officer could have shot his attacker in legs or arm first to incapacitate him rather than lethally aiming for center-mass (the chest and torso), again, a claim which ignores the fact that the legs and arms are far more difficult targets to hit than the chest/torso, especially in cases where someone violently attacks you and there is little time to aim/respond; the evil mob then weeps for the criminal, speculating that he suffered from mental problems, homelessness, discrimination, and/or health issues and, because so, that he did not deserve to die at the hands of some “egotistical,” “cowardly, ” “trigger-happy,” officer, even in cases when this knife wielding perpetrator has an extensive criminal record, a undeniable history of committing evil acts.
If the evil mob is large enough and applies enough social pressure, this can see the brave officer not only fired but also on trial for his life as he must defend himself in court against trumped up charges for doing his duty. The original crime, which first began with an attempted murder on an officer’s life, therefore, is not yet over, as all those who support the criminal and condemn the officer stand culpable and should be strictly punished, a resolved justice, a satisfaction that today is unheard of as the online cowards, the evil mob, will naturally attempt to escape punishment for their crimes by hiding behind Free Speech and the Constitution or whatever rights are granted to them. Yet one must realize that all those who support the now dead, knife-wielding maniac, the vile criminal, the failed murderer, are themselves criminals; they share some measure of guilt within the scope of the entire crime and should face (cyberbullying/false accusation/defamation) charges, or at the very least, vigilante justice, a modern-day tarring and feathering, a simple beating on the street, delivered by a moral citizenry, where the law should naturally turn a blind eye.
One may argue that there will always be crazy dissenters and that this is a natural part of a free society, the issue today is a large bulk, perhaps over two-thirds, of the comments on social media will express condemnation against the officer and/or sympathy for the vile criminal which denotes, even when allowing free speech, a free communication of ideas, reason can no longer prevail. The hideous mass which constitutes these seditious, cowardly fools will naturally demonize and silence all dissent, good people cannot post in a hateful comment section because they will just get viciously attacked also, falsely accused, mocked, and reported then banned, so, in reality, dissent, the free communication of ideas, in fact, is denied. The majority have become evil, and the majority always can impose its will on the minority with the evil masses only imposing mental slavery, irrational toleration (and praise) of oppression and cowardice.
People can claim that commenters on a social media do not reflect the majority of the populace, but one must then ask, “why are evil comments primarily the ones that are surfacing? Not all of these insane comments could be the work of psychological operations (psy ops) from enemy states like China or Russia!” Such a question brings the revelation that perhaps the hateful comment sections, devoid of all integrity and morality, devoid of any respect for the common good, are a closer reflection to modern society that most people realize. It is the same depressing realization when one notices that predominantly only corrupt officials and politicians are rising to the surface from the pool of citizenry. Even so, it is not the commenters, the direct enablers, themselves which are the main problem but the entire populace which tolerates and protects them from punishment.
Free Market Place of ideas no longer works (free speech purists dont have a clever answer to what if objective lies triumph even if free exchange of ideas is allowed.
The Constitution never states one has a right to support criminal behavior. The fact that such online criminals are not brought to justice, today, because modern society considers this criminality, this slander-false accusation-gaslighting-cyberbullying protected speech under citizen’s rights or the First Amendment, in the case of America, stands as undeniable evidence that the Western Nations as a whole have become criminal states. While most of the citizens of the West may not directly support the knife-wielding criminal in the above example, they passively, and perhaps unknowingly, support this criminal, because, should any righteous man or group, attempt to arrest, charge, or otherwise punish (with vigilante justice) the members of the evil online mobs, the ones who were wrongfully supporting the knife-wielding criminal and cyberbullying and slandering the brave officer, these citizens would ultimately side with members of the evil mob, the criminals, and side against the righteous, the truthful witnesses, who seek to bring them to justice. This means the citizenry have become totally tolerant of evil and are willing to fight to defend it against any righteous man who offers noble opposition.
Their “speech” certainly poses a serious threat to the community; no moral person, no person of common sense, of reason, would believe that such sedition, such malignant sympathy and praise, the type granted to the vile criminal, and such revolting slander, the type brought upon the brave officer, is somehow a part of intelligent discourse in a civilized society! Allowing the promotion of malicious lies is a crime because such lies will inevitably cause society to collapse. No police officer will want to defend the community and risk his life if doing so gets him mass shamed, cyberbullied, doxed, fired and possibly wrongfully imprisoned; no good person would want to be a police officer in the first place; without aggressive police, or without police in general, criminals will then be emboldened leading to more crime, total anarchy, so allowing the evil mobs the freedom to slander the brave officer and praise-sympathize with the vile criminal, the knife-wielding maniac, which leads to this outcome, and defending their so-called right to do so, is morally reprehensible; the Western populace has decided it rather foolishly hunt the righteous hunters who seeks to kill both the monster and the minions of the monster.
Transgender lunacy, the absurd claim a person is a man or woman based on how someone feels and demanding others believe this falsity, or else face persecution, is another clear example. Most Western citizens may passively and unknowingly support this insanity, even the rightwing groups who vehemently claim to be against it and who devote all their efforts to mocking and exposing it on their news and social media platforms, because, when push comes to shove, they, like most citizens, would rather attack and criminalize the real truthful witnesses, the righteous who are willing to use justified violence to stop the transgender lunatics attempting to enslave the populace. And make no mistake, the transgender mobs, as toxic tribes, are attempting to impose slavery upon all Western citizens. The only solution to stopping them is violence, even to the point of civil war. Denying them the right to vote, denying them much protection under the of law, even outright outlawing the transgender mobs who are protesting on the street and cyberbullying online, arresting them, charging them and placing them in prisons, or even insane asylums, which naturally demands the use of violence, even deadly force, whenever such criminals-lunatics resist, are the only acceptable methods to dealing with such wretched creatures. Delivering justice, making an example of such criminals, is furthermore necessary to hinder others from joining their perverse cause.
“Why can’t you just use my pronouns” and all the excuses for it, are no different than that scene in StarTrek TNG where Picard is being tortured and the Cardassian has the array of 4 lights behind him and wants Picard to say that there are 3 lights. It’s a dominance mind game to make you submit and comply – especially when it’s contrary to objective reality.
Criminality of the transgender mobs is undeniable, as these satanic groups, using large numbers, constantly shout “trans women are women” and “trans men are men” in the street to intimidate and bully others, statements which are outright lies, and self-evidently so, as there would be no need to say such if such statements were, in fact, true. A crime is clearly being committed, yet the majority of today’s citizens would recoil from the necessary and satisfying violence required to stop it. The citizens behave like cowards and claim the transgender lunatics are still engaging in free speech, freedom of expression, and the right to protest which means to rightfully stop the transgender mobs, to stop their crime, would now be considered a crime itself to the majority of citizens.
Nowhere in the Constitution does it say citizens have a right to maliciously lie which is what the transgender mobs blatantly do when they scream men are women and women are men, yet the majority of citizens ignore this and would outlaw and prosecute those who attempt to enact justice upon the transgender mobs. This means, in reality, although most citizens may claim to be against transgenderism, they, in truth, actually are supporters and defenders of it, and they will defend such perversion against the wrath of truthful witness. This is no different than what with see today with all criminality.
For example, the political left today foolishly and shamefully sympathizes with certain criminals, like rioters, vandals, shoplifters and looters, usually if they are black or brown, blaming their evil acts on white racism, but the political right and overall population still tolerates this, as they will reject any righteous man who advocates necessary punishment upon the criminal sympathizers, with fines and prison time, which makes them exactly the same as the political left they claim to oppose; there is zero distinction. The political right also no doubt sympathizes with certain vile criminals to which both the political left and the overall society is immorally tolerant, again granting no distinction between them. People can claim they want to rid themselves of a rodent infestation, but is this really the case when they attack the exterminator, when they undermine all the exterminator’s attempts, when they sabotage all his efforts to eliminate the rodent problem? One could argue that, in such a case, the rodents and the those defending the rodents are henceforth indistinguishable and both need to be exterminated to remove the infestation.
Property rights almost need to be stripped for example cause Podcast invite people to their property only to degrade them and kick them out
People who support Israel and argue those Anti-sem who condemn Israel or the morally bankrupt who claim both sides are bad still can only say 1) It’s not a genocide, when it should be. Gaza should be obliterated off the face of the Earth if Hamas does not surrender and Israel should be causing more casualties, not less. Pro-Israel Say Israel does its best to avoid civilian by giving them (and thus Hamas) warning. Should not distinguish between the two.
Condemn Hamas for fighting in cities when it is intelligent strategy? Russians were smart to retreat into Stalingrad and funneling the Germans into that urban killing zone where they couldn’t use their Airforce effectively and use their armor to fight a war of maneuver. Cannot even learn from the enemy. 9/11 could be done without the loss of personal to, for example, Qatar
Even those who “support” Israel against its Islamic enemies, like Hamas, still believe in a two-state solution (which is cowardice: like letting a man sleep with your wife). There is no such thing as Palestine and if Israel was conquered the partitioned by its Islamic neighbors, no one would cry about Palestinian independence.
A person cannot invoke panic for no good reason, by yelling “FIRE” in a theater and “SHARK” on a beach if there is no such threat and the person knows there is no such threat or does not see such a theat. Limits on free speech have always existed. A Nazi parade in the USA in the 1977 was allowed, a Nazi parade in the USA in 1942 (when America was at war with Nazi Germany) would not have been allowed, at least to a large scale, or at least public outrage would ensure those who held the parade would get beaten on the street (outside the law, with the law turning a blind eye, which means, the parade, still would not be allowed in reality, albeit, on the books, it would be allowed technically-legally). This is called good discernment, and it is what today’s Western citizens lack. Today, without discernment, under free speech, “ANYTHING GOES,” and many of today’s arguments for free speech are really of cowardice, of a lack of determination to punish evil, slanderous, unruly, and seditious behavior.
Much more interesting a question is should a business be allowed to fire someone for saying obvious truth (not should they be allowed to fire someone for saying evil things) cause what if that business fires someone for goodness and truth and there is no consequences for said business? The free market, freedom has failed.
Traitor society: population undermined own war effort in Iraq and Afghanistan (voted for man named Barack Hussein Obama) (people became less interested in winning wars and policing people for thought crimes) (PROB DELETE THIS)
Terrorist supporters, especially after a terror attack, and transgender loons all should be suppressed and dealt with accordingly whether legally, by the law, or off the books, by the citizenry. The shallow response of “people should be allowed to believe what they want” and “who are you to tell people what to think”, are mere thoughts of a bratty child, of one who has no respect for any authority above themselves, as if these people, when they stand before God after they die believe they can scold the Almighty, “WHO ARE YOU TO TELL ME WHAT TO THINK, WHAT TO BELIEVE,AND WHAT TO DO! when God holds them to account for their selfish deeds without being instantly cast down for eternity into the fiery depths of hell for their willful, sinful defiance. “Who are you to tell me to believe 2+2= 4!” I will believe 2+2= 3 or 2+2= 5″ That is my right!”
This is the new infantile philosophy of the United States, and perhaps the entire Western World. Free speech is now used by citizens as a shield to hide their childishness, their cowardice, their lack of responsibility; it is used to justify their failure to crush the wicked, their failure to punish (and instead foolishly tolerate) those who maliciously lie, gaslight, sow discord, cheer criminals, and commit outright slander.
Dana white shallow response to leftist (transphobia) “People believe what they want” you gonna control what people believe” which is shallow and stupid (go to page 250ish on TW solution)
According to the new philosophy, “people should be allowed to believe what they want?” How very deep! Ok! But what if a man believes others should not be allowed to believe what they want? This must certainly be allowed because, again, “people should be allowed to believe what they want,” which includes “believing other people should not allowed to believe what they want” and such circular reasoning exposes the utter shallowness, the thoughtlessness, the self-contradiction, of today’s thinking. The circular reasoning is no less stupid than a man, in response to the question, “Why did you choose to cross the road” answered “because I choose too.”
According to the new philsophy..ok…what if I believe you should not be allowed to believe what you want.?
Why did you choose to cross the road…cause I choose too
You do your think I do mine (greatest society now can aspire to)??
I’ll tell you what: When Americans stop acting like children, I’ll stop telling them how to behave, sounds fair.
Sodom and Gomorrah
In the biblical tale, the girl who looked back upon the wicked cities of Sodom and Gomorrah being destroyed was turned into a pillar of salt (according to recent interpretations, for disobeying God’, more specifically for his command to not look back on the city as it was being destroyed).
Citizens of the West, and especially in the United States, constantly bicker about rights and freedom, but these shall soon be taken away due to the immorality of the populace. Like children, the citizens have proven unfit to have such rights and freedom, as they accept no responsibility. Free speech is an essential right of all Western countries, but today’s citizens have become criminals in all but name, false witnesses, who now hide behind free speech, who use free speech so they can lie with their tongues constantly and level false accusations upon others while sympathizing with and praising charlatans, degenerates, and fellow criminals. They, en masse, maliciously cyberbully the helpless, hypocritically shaming them for the evil acts they themselves openly commit while verbally attacking any decent person who attempts to defend rules, human decency and the common good. Their freedom shall be lost no matter how much they whine and object; first it will be taken away by the government, not only by the very frauds and charlatans they elect to office, but by reasonable officials and policies that are responding to their ever-growing infantile nature. Soon, no free speech will be allowed online because only childish lies and false accusations prevail online when such freedom is granted. Soon, no video recording will be allowed in public because, for no reason, self-righteous, hypocritical mobs online attack everyone who happens to be recorded. Western citizens deserve this as rights can only become restricted when there is no responsibility. Finally, after rights and freedom have been mostly stripped by government, what little is left will be vanquished by the foreign invader to the point where Western citizens are either killed or enslaved ushering in a New Dark Age.
Have a generation of trolls who post defamatory stuff, who bear false witness, who deserve to get their ass kicked (OF models mocking decency, MMA Guru and Joey shit talking-taunting fighters, How much longer can the thin paper of the Constitution can obstruct/delay justice?
Without Integrity, Free Speech is meaningless (dilemma of either A) allowing the shaming of good police which leads to anarchy since no one good wants to be a police officer of B) outlaw and fine those who shame good police to bring order which restricts freedom
Freedom has now become a liability, working against the citizen body, the entire nation, like a cancer, as Westerners have become evil people willing to use freedom (rights and the Constitution) as a dangerous weapon to torture and defame the innocent, their fellow citizens and neighbors, while maliciously suppressing truth; such a weapon must be, and will be, forcibly removed from the hands of the children who wield it. Western citizens, and the American people especially, can cry and yell “free speech” all they want, as children inevitably will do, without responsibility, more accurately, without the maturity, the integrity of using free speech responsibly, the loss of free speech, along with other rights not used responsibly, is as inevitable as the changing of the seasons.
Capitalism also a cancer (not marxists or socialist that threaten it) it is only fans, fake guru, video game developers who release the game 50% done and charge you per update. Tasers..which require a subscription
Not the totalitarian which threaten free speech but the infantile
What created the West (freedom and free speech) is now killing it.
Use the word malign at some point
Truthful Witness welcomes the intelligent and the brave who recognize and resist the decline of our civilization, its moral decay, and the rise of this New Inquisition that has emerged as a result. We welcome the brave who are not afraid to go against the large cowardly groups, the evil mobs, the online trolls, the internet vigilantes, the self-righteous hypocrites, that gang-up on the helpless for no good reason. We welcome those who have the creativity, uniqueness, and imagination to step outside the Overton Window, as today, those who remain inside the window are clearly driving off a cliff.
We hopefully can unite these intelligent, brave souls so they can free from the tyranny of our age. Hopefully, through our courageous acts of bravely seeking and speaking truth no matter the social pressure, no matter the threat posed by evil mobs, we can help the persecuted and all those who are suffering as a result our decline. At the very least, we can enrage today’s narcissists and evil masses because truth exposes their delusions, lies, hypocrisy, and cowardice.
When the Romans abandoned Britain in 410 A.D, leaving it to the barbarians, the legend of King Arthur and the Kingdom of Camelot was born. The idea that a nation, a sanctuary, still remained for civilized people resonated with the population who were constantly raided, pillaged, and tormented by barbarian invasions and local warlords. Excalibur, Camelot and the Age of Arthur may have been fiction, but it still existed in spirit within the hearts of men at the time, men who sought hope and light in times of darkness, and it certainly exists today, as well as anytime civilization is set to fall into another dark age. Spiritually, we, the Truthful Witness Order, although we are not a nation to ourselves, can still strive to be exist as a New Camelot in this current odious time, we can serve as a bastion of order, reason, justice, and light set to unite and liberate oppressed men.
To join us and participate, please go to our Headquarters.
Need for Common good ignored
When Trump announced plans to get Greenland, most in USA attacked him despite it benefiting..
register
login 
JOIN THE DISCUSSION